Gender Differences in Balance, Lumbar Multifidus Muscle, Pain, and Kinesiophobia in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Author:

Apaydın Aydın Sinan1ORCID,Güneş Musa1ORCID,Köremezli Keskin Nevin1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. KARABUK UNIVERSITY

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to examine balance, lumbar multifidus muscle thickness and cross-sectional area (CSA), pain, disability and kinesiophobia levels, and to compare these parameters in terms of gender in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Material and Methods: This cross-sectional study included 59 patients, 33 (55.9%) female and 26 (44.1%) male, diagnosed with LSS by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Low back and leg pains, dynamic and static balances, disability and kinesiophobia levels of patients with LSS were evaluated. Lumbar multifidus muscle thickness and total CSA were obtained from MRI images. Obtained data were compared according to gender. Results: Females had significantly more low back pain than males (p=0.043), in patients with LSS. Additionally, females with LSS had worse dynamic and static balances (p=0.005, and p=0.001, respectively) and higher levels of disability (p=0.001), and kinesiophobia (p=0.001). Females with LSS had less lumbar multifidus muscle thickness and CSA than males on both the right and left sides. Also, right multifidus muscle thickness correlated with both dynamic (r=-0.289; p=0.027) and static (r=0.349; p=0.007) balances. Significant correlations were detected between low back and leg pain with dynamic and static balances, disability, and kinesiophobia in patients with LSS. Conclusion: Females with LSS have higher levels of pain, disability, and kinesiophobia than males. Also, LSS affects females' balance functions more and causes further degeneration of the multifidus muscle. Therefore, gender differences should be examined during the clinical follow-up process in LSS.

Publisher

Duzce Medical Journal

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3