Affiliation:
1. Medical and Research Services VHAGLA Healthcare System, UCLA Membrane Biology Laboratory, and Division of Nephrology VHAGLA Healthcare System and David Geffen School of Medicine Los Angeles California USA
2. Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology University of Liverpool Liverpool UK
3. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine Los Angeles California USA
4. UCLA Brain Research Institute Los Angeles California USA
Abstract
AbstractAcidification of the cellular lysosome is an important factor in infection of mammalian cells by SARS‐CoV‐2. Therefore, raising the pH of the lysosome would theoretically be beneficial in prevention or treatment of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. Sodium bicarbonate, carbicarb, and THAM are buffers that can be used clinically to provide base to patients. To examine whether these bases could raise lysosomal pH and therefore be a primary or adjunctive treatment of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection, we measured lysosomal and intracellular pH of mammalian cells after exposure to each of these bases. Mammalian HEK293 cells expressing RpH‐LAMP1‐3xFLAG, a ratiometric sensor of lysosomal luminal pH, were first exposed to Hepes which was then switched to sodium bicarbonate, carbicarb, or THAM and lysosomal pH measured. In bicarbonate buffer the mean lysosomal pH was 4.3 ± 0.1 (n = 20); p = NS versus Hepes (n = 20). The mean lysosomal pH in bicarbonate/carbonate was 4.3 ± 0.1 (n = 21) versus Hepes (n = 21), p = NS. In THAM buffer the mean lysosomal pH was 4.7 ± 0.07 (n = 20) versus Hepes (4.6 ± 0.1, n = 20), p = NS. In addition, there was no statistical difference between pHi in bicarbonate, carbicarb or THAM solutions. Using the membrane permeable base NH4Cl (5 mM), lysosomal pH increased significantly to 5.9 ± 0.1 (n = 21) compared to Hepes (4.5 ± 0.07, n = 21); p < 0.0001. Similarly, exposure to 1 mM hydroxychloroquine significantly increased the lysosomal pH to (5.9 ± 0.06, n = 20) versus Hepes (4.3 ± 0.1, n = 20), p < 0.0001. Separately steady‐state pHi was measured in HEK293 cells bathed in various buffers. In bicarbonate pHi was 7.29 ± 0.02 (n = 12) versus Hepes (7.45 ± 0.03, [n = 12]), p < 0.001. In cells bathed in carbicarb pHi was 7.27 ± 0.02 (n = 5) versus Hepes (7.43 ± 0.04, [n = 5]), p < 0.01. Cells bathed in THAM had a pHi of 7.25 ± 0.03 (n = 12) versus Hepes (7.44 ± 0.03 [n = 12]), p < 0.001. In addition, there was no statistical difference in pHi in bicarbonate, carbicarb or THAM solutions. The results of these studies indicate that none of the buffers designed to provide base to patients alters lysosomal pH at the concentrations used in this study and therefore would be predicted to be of no value in the treatment of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. If the goal is to raise lysosomal pH to decrease the infectivity of SARS‐CoV‐2, utilizing lysosomal permeable buffers at the appropriate dose that is non‐toxic appears to be a useful approach to explore.
Subject
Cancer Research,Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous),Molecular Medicine,Physiology
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献