PERLOCATIVE PRAGMATICS OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT INTERROGATIVE SPEECH ACTS IN THE KAZAKH LANGUAGE

Author:

Koshikbayeva G. D.1,Yelikbayev B. K.1,Ybyrayim A. O.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. M. Auezov South Kazakhstan University

Abstract

The article analyzes the concepts of categories of direct and indirect communication in linguistics, types and features of indirect interrogative speech acts, reveals the prelocutive pragmatics of direct and indirect interrogative speech acts in the Kazakh language. Namely: if the direct meaning of interrogative sentences is getting an answer, then indirect questions are used in such functions as showing politeness, indirect posing a question, emphasizing a request, posing a question in a suspicious expression, transmitting a request with gestures, evaluation, resentment, chagrin. In a direct interrogative speech act, the illocutionary effect is expressed through the linguistic meaning of the linguistic means that make up speech, while the perlocutionary pragmatics of indirect interrogative speech acts depends on the use of language units in a figurative sense, on the background knowledge of the speaker and listener and the conditions of communication. At the same time, an indirect interrogative speech act enhances the artistic potential of the language and allows expressing various semantic shades.The study used methods of structural grammar «from form to meaning», functional grammar «from meaning to form», structural-semantic description, functional-semantic and contextual analysis, differentiation and hypothetical interpretation.The scientific and theoretical basis of the scientific conclusions obtained in the course of the study were the works on structural, communicative, functional grammar and pragmatic linguistics in linguistics. In addition, the given language examples from various sources (colloquial speech, works of poets and writers) contributed to the argumentation of scientific and practical conclusions presented in the article

Publisher

A.Baitursynuly Institute of Linguistics

Reference19 articles.

1. Anscombre J.-C., Ducrot O. L’argumentation dans la langue. Philosophie et langague. – Bruxelles: P. Mardaga, 1983. – 184 p. (in France)

2. Austin J.L. How to do things with words. The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. – Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962. – 166 p. (in English)

3. Davison A. Indirect Speech Acts and What to Do with Them. – Syntax and Semantics. – Vol. 3. – Speech Acts. N.Y., 1975. – P. 142-185. (in English)

4. Wunderlich D. Studien zur Sprechakttheorie / D. Wunderlich. – Frankfurt/ M.: Suhrkamp, 1976. – 416 s. (in German)

5. Searle J. Indirect Speech Acts. – Syntax and Semantics. – Vol. 3. Speech Acts. – N.Y., etc.: Academic Press, 1975. – P. 59-82. (in English)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3