Abstract
AbstractThe massive shift to working from home during the Covid-19 pandemic triggered discussions about its potential impact on the future demand for office space and the risk it poses to the performance of office markets. Against this background, the goal of this paper is to investigate the link between working from home and the evolution of key indicators of office occupier markets across Europe over the past three decades. Based on the data from Eurostat and CBRE, the paper uses panel regression to investigate the temporal as well as cross-sectional relationships between the share of the workforce working from home and office rents and vacancy rates in major cities. The results are interesting in several ways. Firstly, changes in the share of employees working from home did not appear to have any significant impact on the evolution of rents or vacancy rates over time. However, occasional homeworking was significant in explaining cross-sectional differences in office market indicators. Moreover, contrary to the initial expectations, higher share of employees occasionally working from home appeared to be associated with stronger performance of the respective office market. As explanation, the paper proposes a hypothesis that this was due to working from home being only one aspect of broader changes in the office work environment and related socio-economic trends that had a net beneficial effect on office occupier markets. Although the results refer to historical developments and may not be fully applicable to the current context of the pandemic, they highlight the need to consider working from home in a broader perspective of office occupier trends and ways of working.
Publisher
Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH
Reference75 articles.
1. Cambridge working papers in economics;A Adams-Prassl,2020
2. Alexander A, De Smet A, Langstaff M, Ravid D (2021) What employees are saying about the future of remote work. McKinsey Global Institute,
3. Allen TD, Golden TD, Shockley KM (2015) How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychol Sci Public Interest 16(2):40–68
4. Ammons SK, Markham WT (2004) Working at hdome: experiences of skilled white collar workers. Sociol Spectr 24(2):191–238
5. Arrelano M (1987) Comuptering robust standard errors for within-group estimators. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 49(4):431–434
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献