Türkiye'de Büyükşehirde Yaşayan Evli Kadınların Uyguladıkları Aile Planlaması Yöntemine İlişkin Görüşleri: Nitel Bir Araştırma

Author:

BİLGİÇ Fatma Şule1ORCID,YILDIZ KARAAHMET Aysu2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. HALİÇ ÜNİVERSİTESİ

2. HALIC UNIVERSITY

Abstract

Objective: This research was conducted to examine the views of women on four different types of family planning they use. Materials and Methods: The period of time for this qualitative study was January through February 2023. 33 Istanbul-based women made up the study's sample. In order to create the greatest possible diversity, the study's participants' women were divided into groups according to their use of intrauterine devices (IUDs), combination oral contraceptives (COC), condoms, and withdrawal methods. Results: Based on information from 33 interviews with Turkish women, this qualitative research. Four different family planning strategies, the decision-making process, attitudes regarding the impact of family planning on sexual life, and four major themes were identified in the article. It has been observed that women are influenced by the environment and health personnel in family planning method choices and decision-making processes, they benefit from the internet, and their spouses are competent in the decision-making process. Conclusion: In this study, it was found that gender norms gave men the authority to decide on reproduction; this means that their partner usually has the final say on the number of children a woman has or planning a pregnancy. The fact that women do not have their own preferences is beneficial in terms of documenting these preferences and concerns of health personnel, as well as integrating them into the design, implementation and evaluation of the intervention, taking into account their caution towards interventions.

Publisher

Turkish Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care

Subject

General Medicine

Reference27 articles.

1. 1. Baltacı A. Qualitative research process: How to conduct a qualitative research?. Journal of Ahi Evran University Institute of Social Sciences. 2019; 5(2), 368-388.

2. 2. Erdogan S. Qualitative research. In Research process, practice and critical in nursing 2015; (1st Edition pp.131-164). Istanbul: Nobel Medical Bookstore.

3. 3. Karatas Z. Qualitative research methods in social sciences. Journal of Spiritually Based Social Work Research. 2015; 1(1), 62-80

4. 4. Whole M, Demir SB. (Editöler). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Ankara: Pegem academy. (2014); 3. Baskı.75-143

5. 5. Eryılmaz N, Ege E. Attitudes of postpartum women towards family planning and related factors. Journal of Human Sciences.2016;13(2):3389-3401.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3