Abstract
The pandemic has made the role that technology-based instruction, such as the use of Learning Management Systems (LMS), must play even more important. But now that face-to-face classes are resumed, it can assist instruction and the provision of distance learning. This study was founded on the idea that LMS improvement may be made by carefully examining the problems and struggles that students face. A validated and pilot-tested survey instrument and social media interviews were used to collect data for the quantitative and qualitative parts of the study, which involved 1,372 and 10 randomly chosen students, respectively. The Quirino State University’s Excellent, Accessible, Resilient, Adaptive Learning Space (QSU e-ARAL) has considerable value in terms of system, information, interaction, instructional quality, and learning quality, according to the findings, as it offers tools, features, contents, and other components that assist students' efficient and productive learning. Holistic learning has numerous advantages, but its full guarantee cannot be provided by using solely the LMS because of the technical, technological, financial, and engagement problems that students encounter when using it. With this, it is expected that the LMS will be enhanced based on user feedback in order to realize its full potential as a tool for instruction and remote learning.
Reference39 articles.
1. Adzharuddin, N., & Ling, L. (2013), Learning Management System (LMS) among University Students: Does it Work?. International Journal of e-Education, E-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 3(3), 248-252. DOI: 10.7763/IJEEEE.2013.V3.233.
2. Alecu, I. N., Marcuta, L., Marcuta, A., & Angelescu, C. (2011), The role of an E-learning platform in the sustainable development of the online learning at the University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine. Scientific Papers Series-Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, 11(2), 5-8.
3. Alenezi, A. (2018), Barriers to Participation in Learning Management Systems in Saudi Arabian Universities. Education Research International, 2018, Article 9085914. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9085914
4. Alghamdi, S., & Bayaga, A. (2016). Use and attitude towards learning management systems (LMS) in Saudi Arabian universities. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9), 2309-2330. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1281a.
5. Alhumsi, M. H., & Alshaye, R. A. (2021). Applying technology acceptance model to Gauge University students' perceptions of using blackboard in learning academic writing. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 13(3), 316-333. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2021.13.017