"Digital Nationalism" as the Embodiment of the Chinese Doctrine of the "Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence"

Author:

Gorian Ella

Abstract

The article focuses on the special public international relations emerging among the subjects of public international law regarding the enforcement of state sovereignty in the conditions of digitalization of the economy and ensuring national interests in the field of security. The subject of the study is the Chinese doctrine of public international law. The author analyzes the legal regulations in the field of digital economy in China. The Chinese model of "digital nationalism" is being analyzed. The state sovereignty over the cyberspace is being embodied through the category of "cyber sovereignty" and the doctrine of "five principles of peaceful coexistence". The state has to implement the policy of "digital nationalism" to ensure its sovereignty. The Chinese theory of public international law is based on the doctrine of the peaceful existence of nations with different political, economic, social and cultural systems, based on a set of five fundamental principles, which facilitate the achievement of common goals while maintaining a balance of national interests. State sovereignty is the crucial point of this doctrine, since peaceful coexistence of nations is achieved through mutual respect for sovereignty. The concept of a "community of common destiny" defines the goal identified by China implementing the five principles of peaceful coexistence. The Chinese approach to the implementation of cyber sovereignty does not imply the "Balkanization" of global cyberspace, on the contrary, it is supposed to maintain the ground for the development of international legal norms in the field of information security. Therefore, the Chinese concept of cyber sovereignty, which is based on "digital nationalism", embodies the logical and expected reaction of national authorities to internal and external security threats. The Chinese theory of public international law is not a scholastic construct, but an objective reality.

Publisher

Aurora Group, s.r.o

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference36 articles.

1. Brownlie, I. (1988). The Rights of Peoples in Modern International Law // The Rights of Peoples / Ed. J.Crawford. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

2. Kolodkin R.A. Fragmentatsiya mezhdunarodnogo prava // Moskovskii zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava. 2005. №2. S. 38–61.

3. He, Z., Sun, L. A Chinese Theory of International Law. Law Press China and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd., 2020. 254 p.

4. Gorian, E. (2022). Genesis of Data Security Mechanism in China: The Next Step to Data Nationalism. China & WTO Review, 2, 255-276.

5. Goryan E.V. Razvitie rossiiskogo pravovogo mekhanizma kiberbezopasnosti: «osobyi put'» ili sledovanie v rusle mezhdunarodnykh tendentsii? // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2019. № 5. S. 1-15.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3