The parties as participants in the international criminal proceedings

Author:

Sedova Daria Alekseevna

Abstract

The article analyzes the historical prerequisites for the development of the concept of the parties as participants in the international criminal process. The analysis of the documents of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, ICTY, ICTR, ICC confirms the thesis that the main parties in the international criminal process are the prosecution and defense. In the model of the international criminal process, the classical approach to the understanding of competition is adopted. There is a structural evolution of the foundations of this approach, the Rome Statute of the ICC defined the rights and obligations of the victims and the third party. The purpose of the study is to consider and resolve problematic aspects of the legal status of the parties in international criminal proceedings. Based on the tasks and goals set, the author has chosen the methodological basis of the study. General scientific methods of cognition are used: analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, induction. The author actively applied the formal legal method. The scientific novelty of the study is to reflect the holistic criminal procedural characteristics of the parties to the defense, prosecution, victims, as well as third parties as participants in criminal proceedings in international criminal proceedings. Analyzing the current structural evolution of the model of international criminal procedure, it is possible not only to predict the further expansion of the functionality of the parties, but also to observe the crystallization of the status of a third party. This course of evolution of the international criminal process demonstrates the probable direction of the development of the theory of parties in the science of criminal procedure.

Publisher

Aurora Group, s.r.o

Reference29 articles.

1. Baumgartner E. Uchastie poterpevshikh v sudoproizvodstve Mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo suda // Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal Krasnogo Kresta. 2008. № 870. S. 277-323.

2. Verle G. Printsipy mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo prava: uchebnik. M.: TransLit. 2011. 910 s.

3. Volevodz A.G. Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravosudie: ot idei k sovremennoi sisteme // Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta. 2009. № 2. S. 55-68.

4. Ven'tsi Ch. O sotrudnichestve s Mezhdunarodnym ugolovnym sudom gosudarstv, ne yavlyayushchikhsya uchastnikami Statuta // Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal Krasnogo Kresta. 2006. № 861. S. 107-136.

5. Efimova T.S. Problemy organizatsii i deyatel'nosti Mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo suda // Aktual'nye issledovaniya. 2023. №6 (136). Ch. II. S. 18-20.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3