Access to healthcare technologies in the context of sanctions and unilateral restrictive measures.

Author:

Malichenko Vladislav Sergeevich,Gadzhieva Albina Omarovna

Abstract

The object of the study is public relations arising from the interaction of international intergovernmental organizations, government agencies, transnational corporations and non-state actors in the framework of ensuring human access to health technologies in the context of unilateral restrictive measures and sanctions. The subject of the study is international legal norms, documents of international organizations, as well as acts of domestic law that form guarantees of ensuring the human right to the highest attainable level of health and access to healthcare technologies. The purpose of the study is to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the practical significance of the application of international legal and domestic mechanisms aimed at minimizing the humanitarian consequences of sanctions and unilateral restrictive measures and expanding access to vital health technologies. The methodology of the study is based on the general scientific method of cognition, including the formal logical and situational method and private law methods, such as comparative, historical and formal legal methods. The article presents an analysis of the importance of health technologies in achieving international goals in the field of development and human health protection, as well as priorities in the implementation of national health strategies. The theoretical aspects of access to healthcare technologies in the context of unilateral restrictive measures are consistently considered as an important element of ensuring international guarantees of human rights protection. The authors present the differences in the normative content of the concepts of "sanctions" and "unilateral restrictive measures" in accordance with international law, as well as a legal assessment of the legitimacy of their application. The article systematizes the consequences of the application of unilateral restrictive measures on the availability of healthcare technologies in various regions of the world, as well as the practice of applying the norms of international and domestic law to overcome them.

Publisher

Aurora Group, s.r.o

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference19 articles.

1. Malichenko V.S. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye mekhanizmy regulirovaniya dostupa k tekhnologiyam zdravookhraneniya // Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki. – 2021. – № 5. – C. 256–285.

2. Kalinin A.V. Ekonomicheskie sanktsii OON i odnostoronnie ekstraterritorial'nye mery ekonomicheskogo prinuzhdeniya: sravnitel'nyi analiz // Yurist-mezhdunarodnik. – 2005. – № 4. – C. 34.

3. Kritskii K.V. Sanktsii i odnostoronnie ogranichitel'nye mery v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave: dis. kand. yur. nauk / Kritskii Kirill Vladimirovich; Moskovskii gosudarstvennyi institut mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii. – Moskva, 2019. – 186 s.

4. Kritskii K.V. Terminy «mezhdunarodnye sanktsii» i «odnostoronnie ogranichitel'nye mery». // Moskovskii zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava. – 2016. – № 2 (102). – S. 204-213.

5. Olyaaeemanesh A., Jaafaripooyan E., Abdollahiasl A. et al. Pharmaceutical subsidy policy in Iran: a qualitative stakeholder analysis. // Health Res Policy Sys. – 2021. – Vol. 19. – № 150. – P. 1-17.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3