Quantitative Analysis of the Impact of Official Development Assistance of the United States and China on the Voting of Sub-Saharan Africa in the UN General Assembly

Author:

Baev Aleksandr,Rakhimov Daler Ëkubdzhonovich

Abstract

The subject of the study is the development assistance of the United States and China to Sub-Saharan states and its impact on the voting of recipient countries in the UN General Assembly.The object of the study is the relations of the United States and China with Sub-Saharan Africa. The author examines in detail such aspects of the topic as development assistance, as well as voting in the UN General Assembly. Particular attention is paid to the impact of development assistance from donor States represented by the United States and China on the voting in the UNGA of recipient states on key issues of interest to China and the United States. The main conclusions of this study are the following: the more African countries receive more aid from the United States, the more they tend to vote for the same opinion as the United States in the UN General Assembly. On the other hand, China's assistance did not have a significant impact on the similarity of foreign policy between China and the recipient African States. The novelty of the study lies in the regression analysis. In addition to the amount of aid to African countries in the United States and China, the work includes variables that may influence the UN General Assembly vote on African recipient States in the statistical model as control variables based on existing research.

Publisher

Aurora Group, s.r.o

Subject

General Medicine

Reference21 articles.

1. Morgenthau H. A political theory of foreign aid //American political science review. – 1962. – T. 56. – №. 2. – P. 301-309.

2. Alesina A., Weder B. Do corrupt governments receive less foreign aid? //American economic review. – 2002. – T. 92. – №. 4. – P. 1126-1137.

3. Dreher A., Nunnenkamp P., Thiele R. Does US aid buy UN general assembly votes? A disaggregated analysis //Public Choice. – 2008. – T. 136. – №. 1. – P. 139-164.

4. Gates S., Hoeffler A. Global aid allocation: are Nordic countries different //Centre for Study of African Economies. Oxford. Working paper. – 2004. – T. 34. – P. 79.

5. Ruttan V. W. United States development assistance policy: the domestic politics of foreign economic aid. – Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996. P. 72.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3