The Concept of Legal Relations in a Marxist Perspective

Author:

Solomko Zarianna

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problem of theoretical and legal understanding of legal relations. The subject of the study is bifurcated – the general attitudes of the post-Soviet mainstream discourse in this area are compared with the marginalized ideas of the Marxist theory of legal relations, supplemented by the ideas of the modern Marxist theory of society, which are significant for its concretization in modern conditions. The article's main goal is to problematize the methodological foundations of the understanding of legal relations that prevails in the post–Soviet theory of law, and to draw attention to the potential of Marxist methodology. The methodological basis of the work is the authentic and early Soviet Marxist theory of law and the modern concept of a global class society. Representatives of the post–Soviet mainstream theory failed to make a breakthrough in understanding legal relations and comprehend one of the most pressing problems of post-Soviet law and order - the gap between positive legal models of legal relations and the practice of their implementation. Theoretical understanding of legal relations has a chance to break out of the vicious positivist-neo-Kantian circle, within which legal relations are understood as a derivative of the norm of positive law, and thinking gets bogged down in the dichotomy of due and being, if the tools of Marxist theory, cleared of ideological layers, are restored. An important role in the dialectical understanding of legal relations is played by the distinction between material and volitional relations, the understanding of legal relations as a type of volitional relations that simultaneously act as a form of other social relations, while the legal relations that are actually developing are understood as the most concrete form of law. In modern conditions, the scientific understanding of legal relations requires distinguishing between different types of material and volitional relations – orthocapitalist and paracapitalist – within the framework of a global class society. Their difference explains the "gap" that has arisen in the post-Soviet space between positive legal models of legal relations, constructed largely on the model of orthocapitalist relations, and real legal relations, which by their nature are paracapitalist.

Publisher

Aurora Group, s.r.o

Subject

General Medicine

Reference24 articles.

1. Nersesyants V. S. Filosofiya prava. M.: Norma, 2005. 656 s.

2. Mal'tsev G. V. Sotsial'nye osnovaniya prava. M.: Norma, 2007. 800 s.

3. Gadzhiev G. A. Dogovor kak obshchepravovaya tsennost' (k voprosu o genezise yuridicheskoi epistemologii) // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2019. № 1 (265). S. 5-18.

4. «Institut suda yavno otstaet ot trebovanii obshchestva»: interv'yu s Konstantinom Sklovskim // URL: https://zakon.ru/discussion/2020/5/8/institut_suda_yavno_otstaet_ot_trebovanij_obschestva__intervyu_s_konstantinom_sklovskim (data obrashcheniya: 28. 06. 2022).

5. Ivanov A. A. Problema primitivizatsii grazhdanskogo prava Rossii // Zakon. 2015. № 5. S. 58-64.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3