Abstract
The article substantiates the necessity and possibility of integrating the environmental and systemic approach in the sociological study of the residential environment. The relevance of such integration is due to the complexity of the object – the residential environment – requiring the combined efforts of representatives of different professional communities (architects, urban planners, design engineers, sociologists, etc.), on the one hand, and the lack of conceptual foundations (language, general methodological and conceptual framework) for such an association, on the other. The importance of such studies for the subsequent social forecasting of the residential environment and the possibility of their application in connection with changes in the technologies used in the development of project documentation and the transition to the creation of information models is noted. The results of the work: 1) on the basis of a comparative analysis of concepts and studies within the framework of the "environmental" and "systemic approaches," their differences and similarities are revealed; 2) a definition of the residential environment is proposed; 3) on the basis of an analysis of the Russian regulatory framework for housing construction, the features of the modern use of a systematic approach in this area are shown; 4) the domestic tradition is presented a systematic (organismic) approach in the design of the living environment; 5) on the basis of theoretical reconstruction, a conclusion is made about the cognitive possibilities of tectology, in the research and formation of the living environment, the synthesis of existing approaches and the basis of promising interdisciplinary associations. Novelty: the potential of tectology, systems theory and system analysis as a promising methodological approach in the sociological study of the residential area, the synthesis of existing approaches and the unification of theorists and practitioners in its study, design and development is revealed. The results of the work are supposed to be used as a basis for the development of a methodology for a specific sociological study of the residential environment, its subjects and quality criteria.
Reference44 articles.
1. Starikov, A. A. Kachestvo zhizni grazhdan i komfortnaya gorodskaya sreda / A. A. Starikov // Akademicheskii vestnik UralNIIproekt RAASN. – 2017. – № 3(34). – S. 46-49. – EDN ZJRZGR.
2. Seliverstov, Yu. I. Nekotorye aspekty realizatsii natsional'nogo proekta "Zhil'e i gorodskaya sreda" / Yu. I. Seliverstov // Upravlenie gorodom: teoriya i praktika. – 2019. – № 1(32). – S. 67-76. – EDN EGHQNC.
3. Shubenkov, M. V. Sovremennyi gorod kak antropogenno-prirodnaya sistema / M. V. Shubenkov, M. Yu. Shubenkova // Arkhitektura i sovremennye informatsionnye tekh-nologii. – 2020. – № 4(53). – S. 182-190. – DOI 10.24411/1998-4839-2020-15311. – EDN HGUIUC.
4. Abakumov R. G. Formirovanie prioritetov i trebovanii, pred''yavlyaemykh k stroi-tel'stvu zhil'ya ekonomklassa na rynke zhiloi nedvizhimosti // Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika. Sotsiologiya. Me-nedzhment. 2020. T. 10, № 1. S. 106–117.
5. Volkova, D. Cheloveko-metry, potrebiteli, "pravil'nye" i "nepravil'nye" zhite-li: reprezentatsiya gorozhanina v diskurse o novykh zhilykh raionakh Moskvy / D. Volkova // Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie. – 2021. – T. 20. – № 3. – S. 215-243. – DOI 10.17323/1728-192X-2021-3-215-243. – EDN JEUFWT.