Beläggsmodellen i svenska nationella prov

Author:

Bach FrankORCID

Abstract

In the Swedish national tests, the so-called “Beläggsmodell” is used to generate test grades in seven school subjects. This article examines the origin and effects of the “Beläggsmodell” on test scores in one of these subjects, Religious studies. Classical methods for evaluating the quality of tests are used in combination with confirmatory factor analysis. The results show that the tests have a reliability above 0.92 and that the “Beläggsmodell” reduces this in unpredictable ways for individual students. Confirmatory factor analysis shows that the tests are mainly one-dimensional, which has the consequence that the “Beläggsmodell” does not fulfill any meaningful function. Instead, it has major consequences for different students' test grades. There are examples of students who at the same total score on the test receive everything from D to A as a test grade. The large differences arise through differences in performance on a very small number of items. If, instead, the total sum is used as a basis for generating test grades, the possibilities for fair and equivalent test grades increase, as shown by examples. Responsible authorities should as soon as possible consider switching to a system where the total sum points is the basis for the test grades.

Publisher

Malmo University

Reference34 articles.

1. Att betygsätta elevers kunskaper – möjligheter och begränsningar
Grading pupils' knowledge – possibilities and limitations

2. Bårman, K., Nyström, P., Rask, L., & Åström, M. (2010). Ämnesproven i biologi, fysik och kemi i årskurs 9. https://www.skolverket.se/publikationsserier/ovrigt-material/2010/amnesproven-i-biologi-fysik-och-kemi-i-arskurs-9.

3. Latent Variable Modeling Using R

4. Jakten på kritisk pedagogikk

5. Brandén, H. (2016). Kritisk Realism. Linköping University Electronic Press. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-131613

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3