Affiliation:
1. University of Ottawa, Canada
Abstract
The political salience of policy issue arenas related to the movement of people, including immigration, citizenship, and asylum, has increased in recent decades and is likely to continue to escalate for the foreseeable future, because of both real dynamics of migration flows and because of political dynamics including reactions to the Covid-19 pandemic. Existing governance regimes at the global, regional, and national levels somewhat order the migration issue arena and do much humanitarian good, but they also generate new problems and injustices. The perception of disorder in migration and citizenship are likely to continue to present challenges for liberal democracy and for international cooperation. This article outlines the contours of challenges of governing the movement of people since the end of the Cold War.
Reference139 articles.
1. Achenwall, G. Elementa Iuris Naturae (1st ed. with J.S. Pütter). Göttingen 1750, 1753, 1755-56 (a later edition appeared in two parts as Ius Naturae in usum auditorum and Iuris Naturalis, Pars Posterior, 1758-59, 1763, 1767-68, 1774). [Kant used the 1763 edition]
2. Allison, H., 1990. Kant’s Theory of Freedom, Cambridge. 2012. Essays on Kant. Oxford
3. Anderson, G. 1923. «Kants Metaphysik der Sitten – ihre Idee und ihr Verhaltnis zur Ethik der Wolffschen Schule», Kant-Studien 28 (1923), pp. 41 -61
4. Antognazza, M.R. 2009. Leibniz. An Intellectual Biography. Cambridge
5. Avineri, S., 2002. Hegel’s Theory of the Modern State, 2nd ed., Cambridge