Vision is the Art of Seeing Things Invisible - An invitro Comparative Evaluation
Author:
Jaidka Rishi,Pandit I.K.,Jawa Deepti,Nishad Md
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Background
Restoration failure due to secondary caries is a continuing problem in restorative dentistry.
Aims and objective
The present study is undertaken to see whether various fluoridated dentifrices recharge fluoride releasing restorative materials and, comparatively evaluate their recharging capabilities.
Materials and method
Materials used in the study are Fuji II LC, Compomer, Teethmate F1, Alfadent sealant. Dentifrices used are Sodiumflouride and Sodiummonoflurophasphate releasing. All restorative materials were mixed according to manufacturer's instruction and standardized test pellets were made using autoclaved instruments in sterile Teflon moulds. These test pellets were divided in various groups and brushed with various fluoridated and nonfluoridated dentifrices accordingly . Results were evaluated stastically using ANOVA, t-test and correlation coefficient for which regression lines were drawn. It was concluded that Sodiumfluoride containing dentifrices recharged fluoride releasing restorative material more than Sodium monoflurophasphate containing dentifrices
Publisher
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing
Reference44 articles.
1. Dionysopoulos P, Kotsanos N, Papadogiannisy Y, Konstantinidis A. Artificial secondary caries around two new fluoride containing restoratives. Oper Dent 1998;23:81–86.
2. Hicks JM, Flaitz CM. Resin modified glass ionomer restorations and in vitro secondary caries formation in coronal enamel. Quintessence Int 2000;31:570–78.