Are Results of Surgical Treatment for Calcaneal Fractures better than Nonoperative Treatment?

Author:

Gahlot Nitesh

Abstract

ABSTRACT The methods of treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACFs) have always been surrounded by controversies, whether operative treatment is better or conservative. Some randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been published comparing the operative vs conservative management options for DIACFs, but the conclusions are varied, with some of them supporting operative treatment while others showing equivocal results. To get some clarity on this subject, we reviewed 9 RCTs and 4 meta-analyses to evaluate the evidence that was present for both operative and nonoperative methods of management. Most studies report equivocal outcomes of operatively and nonoperatively managed DIACFs when looked at; however on stratification of groups, the evidence seemingly points towards better functional results in the operated patients who do not develop a complication, but poorer outcomes in patients with more severe injury patterns (higher Sanders’ Type). Complications were associated with both groups; no differentiation between closed and open fractures is made in most studies, leading to slightly higher rate of complications in the operated group (probably due to open cases inclusion); nevertheless the difference was not found significant. Despite a high level of interest in calcaneal fractures, the current evidence in published literature does not support a specific management protocol for DIACFs, although detailed analysis points to importance of patient selection, surgeon experience and soft tissue status. As of today, there is a need for larger randomized trials, which should also clarify the role of extensile approach vis a vis Minimally Invasive Surgery, to address this question and bring out a conclusive answer. How to cite this article Dhillon MS, Gahlot N. Are Results of Surgical Treatment for Calcaneal Fractures better than Nonoperative Treatment? J Foot Ankle Surg (Asia-Pacific) 2014; 1(1):17-23.

Publisher

Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing

Subject

Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Fuel Technology

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3