Author:
Ballini Andrea,Desiate Apollonia,Cantore Stefania
Abstract
ABSTRACT
The osseointegration rate of titanium dental implants is related to their composition and surface roughness. Rough-surfaced implants favor both bone anchoring and biomechanical stability.
The future of dental implantology should aim to develop surfaces with controlled and standardized topography or chemistry.
This approach will be the only way to understand the interactions between proteins, cells and tissues and implant surfaces. The local release of bone stimulating or resorptive drugs in the peri-implant region may also respond to difficult clinical situations with poor bone quality and quantity, such as implant design and surface. These therapeutic strategies should ultimately enhance the osseointegration process of dental implants for their immediate loading and long-term success. Aim of this work was to compare implant titanium surfaces prepared with two different topographies for evaluating osteoblasts adhesion and growth.
How to cite this article
Ballini A, Desiate A, Cantore S. In vitro Comparison between Two Different Implant Titanium Surfaces in Osseointegration Process. Int J Experiment Dent Sci 2012; 1(2):84-88.
Publisher
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing
Reference40 articles.
1. Osseointegrated Oral Implants
2. Albrektsson T, Dahl E, Enbom L, Engevall S, Engquist B, Eriksson AR, et al. Osseointegrated oral implants.A Swedish multicenter study of 8139 consecutively inserted Nobelpharma implants. J Periodontol 1988 May;59(5):287-96.
3. Lekholm U, van Steenberghe D, Herrmann L, Bolender C, Folmer T, Gunne J, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous jaws: A prospective 5-years multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9(6):627-35.
4. Clinical and statistical analyses of human clinical trials with the single crystal aluminum oxide endosteal dental implant: Five-year results