Comparative Study of the Crestal vs Subcrestal Placement of Dental Implants via Radiographic and Clinical Evaluation-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparative Study of the Crestal vs Subcrestal Placement of Dental Implants via Radiographic and Clinical Evaluation

Published:2022-09-23 Issue:6 Volume:23 Page:623-627
ISSN:1526-3711
Container-title:The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Shashikala R,Chatterjee Puja,Navneetham Anuradha

Publisher

Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing

Subject

General Dentistry

Link

https://www.thejcdp.com/doi/pdf/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3350

Reference11 articles.

1. 1. Romanos GE, Aydin E, Gaertner K, et al. Long-term results after subcrestal or crestal placement of delayed loaded implants. Clinical implant dentistry and related research 2015;17(1):133–141. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12084.

2. 2. Degidi M, Perrotti V, Shibli JA, et al. Equicrestal and subcrestal dental implants: A histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of nine retrieved human implants. J Periodontol 2011;82(5):708–715.

3. 3. Nagarajan B, Murthy V, Livingstone D, et al. Evaluation of crestal bone loss around implants placed at equicrestal and subcrestal levels before loading: a prospective clinical study. J Clin Diag Res 2015;9(12):ZC47. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/13911.7000.

4. 4. Albrektsson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1(1):11–25.

5. 5. Sotto–Maior BS, Lima CD, Senna PM, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of subcrestal dental implants with different bone anchorages. Braz Oral Res 2014;28(1):1–7. DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2014.vol28.0023.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Crestal and Subcrestal Placement of Morse Cone Implant–Abutment Connection Implants: An In Vitro Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Study;Biomedicines;2023-11-16