Author:
Kyoizumi Hideaki,Yamada Junji,Suzuki Toshimitsu,Kanehira Masafumi,Finger Werner J,Sasaki Keiichi
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Aim
To investigate and compare the effects of toothbrushes with different hardness on abrasion and surface roughness of composite resins.
Materials and methods
Toothbrushes (DENT. EX Slimhead II 33, Lion Dental Products Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) marked as soft, medium and hard, were used to brush 10 beam-shaped specimens of each of three composites resins (Venus [VEN], Venus Diamond [VED] and Venus Pearl [VEP]; HeraeusKulzer) with standardized calcium carbonate slurry in a multistation testing machine (2N load, 60 Hz). After each of five cycles with 10k brushing strokes the wear depth and surface roughness of the specimens were determined. After completion of 50k strokes representative samples were inspected by SEM. Data were treated with ANOVA and regression analyses (p < 0.05).
Results
Abrasion of the composite resins increased linearly with increasing number of brushing cycles (r2 > 0.9). Highest wear was recorded for VEN, lowest for VED. Hard brushes produced significantly higher wear on VEN and VEP, whereas no difference in wear by toothbrush type was detected for VED. Significantly highest surface roughness was found on VED specimens (Ra > 1.5 μm), the lowest one on VEN (Ra < 0.3 μm). VEN specimens showed increased numbers of pinhole defects when brushed with hard toothbrushes, surfaces of VEP were uniformly abraded without level differences between the prepolymerized fillers and the glass filler-loaded matrix, VED showed large glass fillers protruding over the main filler-loaded matrix portion under each condition.
Conclusion
Abrasion and surface roughness of composite resins produced by toothbrushing with dentifrice depend mainly on the type of restorative resin. Hardness grades of toothbrushes have minor effects only on abrasion and surface roughness of composite resins. No relationship was found between abrasion and surface roughness.
Clinical significance
The grade of the toothbrush used has minor effect on wear, texture and roughness of the composite resin.
How to cite this article
Kyoizumi H, Yamada J, Suzuki T, Kanehira M, Finger WJ, Sasaki K. Effects of Toothbrush Hardness on in vitro Wear and Roughness of Composite Resins. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(6):1137-1144.
Publisher
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing
Reference42 articles.
1. Frandsen A. Mechanical oral hygiene practices. In: Dental plaque control measures and oral hygiene practices. Ed. Löe H and Kleinman DV. IRL Press, Oxford 1986;93-116.
2. ISO 8627. Dentistry – Stiffness of the tufted area of toothbrushes. International Standard 1987.
3. Toothbrush Abrasion of Resin Composites with Different Filler Concepts
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献