Comparative Evaluation of Ridge Width for Implant Placement Using Ridge Mapping on the Diagnostic Cast, Cone-beam Computed Tomography, and Direct Surgical Measurements-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparative Evaluation of Ridge Width for Implant Placement Using Ridge Mapping on the Diagnostic Cast, Cone-beam Computed Tomography, and Direct Surgical Measurements

Published:2022-06-10 Issue:2 Volume:23 Page:186-192
ISSN:1526-3711
Container-title:The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Chhina Shivjot,Saurav Kumar,Choudhary Sourav Boro,Asthana Garima,Kalsi Rupali,Mishra Shivesh Kumar,Peku Hiba,Ahmad Zoya

Publisher

Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing

Subject

General Dentistry

Link

https://www.thejcdp.com/doi/pdf/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3294

Reference17 articles.

1. 1. Castro-Ruiz CT, Noriega J, Guerrero ME. Validity of ridge mapping and cone beam computed tomography in dental implant therapy. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2015;19(3):290–293. DOI: 10.4103/0972-124X.154189.

2. 2. Chen LC, Lundgren T, Hallström H, et al. Comparison of different methods of assessing alveolar ridge dimensions prior to dental implant placement. J Periodontol 2008;79(3):401–405. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2008.070021.

3. 3. Scaf G, Lurie AG, Mosier KM, et al. Dosimetry and cost of imaging osseointegrated implants with film-based and computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;83(1):41–48. DOI: 10.1016/s1079-2104(97)90089-5.

4. 4. Zhang X, Li Y, Ge Z, et al. The dimension and morphology of alveolar bone at maxillary anterior teeth in periodontitis: a retrospective analysis—using CBCT. Int J Oral Sci 2020;12(1):4. DOI: 10.1038/s41368-019-0071-0.

5. 5. Benavides E, Rios HF, Ganz SD, et al. Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists consensus report. Implant Dent 2012;21(2):78–86. DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31824885b5.