Effects of Different Carbon Sources on Growth and Some Innate Immune Responses of Russian Sturgeon (Acipenser gueldenstaedtii) in Biofloc Systems
Author:
YAZICI İrfan Selçuk1ORCID, BERBER Selçuk2ORCID, ÖZCELEP Tuna1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Central Fisheries Research Institute, Trabzon, Türkiye 2. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Faculty of Marine Sciences and Technology, Department of Basic Science, Çanakkale, Türkiye
Abstract
The Russian sturgeon (Acipenser gueldenstaedtii) species is in high demand owing to its valuable caviar. Therefore, it is in danger of extinction. Since the Russian sturgeon reaches sexual maturity late in its life cycle, this species has a high economic cost for farmers. However, this high cost can be reduced with an environmentally friendly system called biofloc technology. This study compared the growth performance and health indicators of biofloc groups using different carbon sources such as starch (BS), molasses (BM) and dextrose (BD). In the 60-day study, fish with an average initial weight of 106.44±5.79 g were stocked in tanks at a density of 21 fish/tank (0.4 m3/tank). The water temperature was set at 19 ℃ degrees throughout the study. On the 30th and 60th days of the experiment, fish were weighted to measure the growth parameters and sampled for immune indices. No mortality was observed in any group throughout the study. A between group comparison of weight gain revealed that BS and BM (105.51±2.26; 100.50±2.18) performed better than the control (BC, without external carbon sources) and BD groups (95.90±2.09; 87.36±2.18) (P<0.05). Furthermore, FCR and SGR were calculated from the data obtained at the end of the experiment, and the data shows that the BS and BM groups were statistically more effective than the other groups. Moreover, a comparison of NBT, lysozyme and myeloperoxidase enzyme activities indicated that all BFT groups had a stronger immune system than the control group (P<0.05). According to the results, the immune-enhancing effect of BFT for sturgeon was determined, and it was reported that BS and BM are more suitable for use in this species in terms of FCR and SGR, as they result an economic and environmentally friendly production.
Publisher
Marine Science and Technology Bulletin
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference44 articles.
1. Adineh, H., Naderi, M., Hamidi, M. K., & Harsij, M. (2019). Biofloc technology improves growth, innate immune responses, oxidative status, and resistance to acute stress in common carp (Cyprinus carpio) under high stocking density. Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 95, 440-448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2019.10.057 2. Aghabarari, M., Abdali, S., & Yousefi Jourdehi, A. (2021). The effect of Biofloc system on water quality, growth and hematological indices of Juvenile great sturgeon (Huso huso). Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences, 20(5), 1467-1482. 3. Ahmad, I., Babitha Rani, A. M., Verma, A. K., & Maqsood, M. (2017). Biofloc technology: An emerging avenue in aquatic animal healthcare and nutrition. Aquaculture International, 25(3), 1215-1226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-016-0108-8 4. Asaduzzaman, M., Wahab, M. A., Verdegem, M. C. J., Huque, S., Salam, M. A., & Azim, M. E. (2008). C/N ratio control and substrate addition for periphyton development jointly enhance freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii production in ponds. Aquaculture, 280(1-4), 117-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.04.019 5. Assefa, A., & Abunna, F. (2018). Maintenance of fish health in aquaculture: review of epidemiological approaches for prevention and control of infectious disease of fish. Veterinary Medicine International, 2018, 5432497. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5432497
|
|