Comparison of Chinese and international research on physical literacy in education – a visual analysis based on CiteSpaceV
-
Published:2024-03-22
Issue:1
Volume:24
Page:285-296
-
ISSN:
-
Container-title:Fizjoterapia Polska
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Fiz Pol
Author:
Dong Wenting1, Ali Syed Kamaruzaman Syed1, Kamaruddin Azni Yati1, Xiang Changqing2, Pratama Kukuh Wahyudin3, Sutapa Panggung4, Karakauki Manil4
Affiliation:
1. Department of Educational Foundation and Humanities, Faculty of Education, University of Malaya, Malaysia 2. Department of Sport Studies, Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra, Malaysia 3. Department of Physical Education, Fakultas Pendidikan Islam dan Keguruan, Universitas Garut, Indonesia 4. Department of Sport Science, Faculty of Sport Science, Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia
Abstract
In order to explore the comparison of Chinese and international frontier hots pots and development trend on physical literacy in education (PLIE) research, 118 research articles included in China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and 1439 research articles included in Web of Science (WOS) core collection related to “physical literacy in education” were used as the research objects. CiteSpace V (version 5.8.R3 - 64 bit) is used to create a visual knowledge map of this research field and analyzed the time distribution, authors, institutions and keywords. The results show that the time distribution of research stages in China is generally consistent with that of international research. Although Chinese research in this field is also among the top in the world, the distribution of authors and institutions is more homogeneous than international ones, and the cooperation between authors and institutions is very weak. In terms of the age distribution of the study population, international studies cover almost all age groups and are more diverse in research content. In contrast, Chinese research is limited to focus on adolescents and college students, and the research content is mostly on physical education and school physical education. There is still a gap between China and the international advanced level in the field of PLIE research, and it is necessary to strengthen the longitudinal and interdisciplinary exploration in the future. The concept of physical literacy needs to be further researched and defined and more research results need to be published in influential journals to expand the influence of the field of PLIE research both in China and internationally.
Publisher
DJ Studio Dariusz Jasinski
Reference54 articles.
1. Whitehead, M. (1993, July). Physical literacy. In International Association of Physical Education and Sport for Girls and Women Congress. Melbourne. 2. Nugroho, S., Nasrulloh, A., Karyono, T. H., Dwihandaka, R., & Pratama, K. W. (2021). Effect of intensity and interval levels of trapping circuit training on the physical condition of badminton players. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 21, 1981-1987. 3. Nasrulloh, A., Prasetyo, Y., Nugroho, S., Yuniana, R., Pratama, K. W., Mustapha, A., & Idrus, S. Z. S. (2020, April). Tricet Method to Increase the Hypertrophy Muscle. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1529, No. 3, p. 032006). IOP Publishing. 4. Shearer, C., Goss, H.R., Edwards, L.C., Keegan, R.J., Knowles, Z.R., Boddy, L.M., Durden-Myers, E.J., & Foweather, L. (2018). How is physical literacy defined? A contemporary update. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37(3), 237-245. 5. Sutapa, P., Prasetyo, Y., Pratama, K. W., Karakauki, M., Mustapha, A., & Idrus, S. Z. S. (2020, April). Motor Development Index (MDI) Based on Combination of Human Development Index (HDI) and Sport Development Index (SDI) as a Success Parameter of Motor Development among Preschool Children: An Observational Study. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1529, No. 3, p. 032003). IOP Publishing.
|
|