Assessment of control during movement, fine motor skills/handwriting, and gross motor control in children with developmental coordination disorder using the DCD-Q
-
Published:2023-12-31
Issue:5
Volume:23
Page:308-312
-
ISSN:
-
Container-title:Fizjoterapia Polska
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Fiz Pol
Affiliation:
1. SRM College of Physiotherapy, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu District, Tamil Nadu, India 2. Department of Paediatrics, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu District, Tamil Nadu, India
Abstract
Motor coordination and control are affected by Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD), particularly in children. As a result, they are unable to write, tie shoelaces, or participate in sports, affecting their social interactions and quality of life. Considering the poor short-term and long-term outcomes observed in children with DCD, awareness of this condition may increase, prompting more research. Among 99 children with DCD, a six-week intervention was performed in both control and intervention groups. In addition to the DCD-Q questionnaire, parents completed a fine motor/handwriting and gross motor control questionnaire. An ANOVA test was used to analyze all values as mean ± SD. The results showed that both groups improved in motor coordination and control. DCD-related motor difficulties can be addressed more effectively with early intervention in all three domains, especially fine motor control. The control group’s motor control scores increased from 17.9 ± 0.6 at baseline to 21.5 ± 0.5 by the sixth week, with a statistically significant p-value of 0.009. Alternatively, the intervention group’s scores improved from 19.6 ± 0.5 at baseline to 22.4 ± 0.5 at the sixth week, with a statistically significant p-value of 0.007. With regards to fine motor control, the control group’s scores improved from 13.4 ± 1.08 at baseline to 16.4 ± 0.6 at the sixth week, with a statistically significant p-value of 0.01. With regards to fine motor control, the intervention group’s scores improved from 14.5 ± 0.3 at baseline to 20.3 ± 1.4 at the sixth week, with a statistically significant p-value of 0.004. As for gross motor control, the control group’s score increased from 16.6 ± 1.05 at baseline to 20.2 ± 1.0 at the sixth week, showing high statistical significance with a p-value of <0.0001. The intervention group’s scores improved from 18.7 ± 0.5 at baseline to 21.5 ± 0.7 at the sixth week, also demonstrating statistical significance with a p-value of 0.002. Overall, this study highlights the potential benefits of tailored interventions in enhancing motor skills and overall quality of life for children with DCD.
Publisher
DJ Studio Dariusz Jasinski
Subject
General Medicine,General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science,General Medicine,Ocean Engineering,General Medicine,General Medicine,General Medicine,General Medicine,General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science,General Medicine
Reference22 articles.
1. 1. Polatajko, H.J., Macnab, J.J., Anstett, B., Malloy-Miller, T., Murphy, K., & Noh, S. (1995). A_clinical trial of the process-oriented treatment approach for children with developmental coordination disorder. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 37(4), 310-319. 2. 2. Macnab, J.J., Miller, L.T., & Polatajko, H.J. (2001). The search for subtypes of DCD: Is Cluster analysis the answer? Human Movement Science, 20, 49-72. 3. 3. Hendry, L. B. (1983). Growing up and growing out: Adolescents and leisure. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press. 4. 4. Larson, R. W. (2000). Toward a_psychology of positive youth development. American Psychologist, 55(1), 170-183. 5. 5. Polatajko, H. J., & Cantin, N. (2005). Developmental Coordination Disorder (dyspraxia): An overview of the state of the art._Paper presented at the Seminars in Pediatric Neurology.
|
|