Comparison of the effectiveness Tepurak therapy with deep tissue massage and stretching in treating non-specific low back pain injuries

Author:

Delano Enggista Hendriko1,Kushartanti Wara1,Arovah Novita Intan1,As Shafi Sabda Hussain1,Nugroho Wahyu Aji1,Sabillah Muhamad Ichsan1,Ndayisenga Japhet2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Sports Science, Faculty of Sports and Health Sciences, Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia

2. Institute of Physical Education and Sports, University of Burundi, Burundi

Abstract

This study aimed to determine: (1) The effectiveness of Tepurak therapy (press, hit, motion) in treating non-specific Low Back Pain (LBP) injuries. (2) The effectiveness of a combined Deep Tissue Massage with stretching (DTMS) in treating non-specific LBP injuries. (3) A comparison of the effectiveness between Tepurak therapy and the combination of Deep Tissue Massage with stretching in treating non-specific LBP injuries. Recovery indicators included pain level and range of motion (ROM). This pre-experimental research used two distinct sample groups with different treatments. The sample comprised 42 individuals with non-specific LBP injuries, who were randomly divided into two groups of 21. Group A underwent Tepurak therapy (press, hit, motion), while Group B received combined Deep Tissue Massage and stretching (DTMS). Each treatment session lasted 30 minutes. Pain levels were measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), while ROM was assessed with the modified Schober Test and the Fingertip-to-Floor instruments. The data analysis employed various tests, including the Paired t-test, Wilcoxon, independent t-test, and Mann-Whitney. The findings revealed that Tepurak therapy reduced pain and significantly enhanced ROM (p < 0.05). Similarly, the Deep Tissue Massage combined with stretching notably diminished pain and improved ROM (p < 0.05). Comparing the pretest and posttest data between Tepurak therapy and the Deep Tissue Massage with stretching on pain and ROM indicators yielded a p-value > 0.05. This suggests that there was no significant difference in the effectiveness of the two therapy types. Based on this study, it's recommended that either Tepurak therapy or the combination of Deep Tissue Massage with stretching can be employed to treat individuals with non-specific LBP. The choice should depend on the specific situation and conditions, taking into account the pros and cons of each therapy type.

Publisher

DJ Studio Dariusz Jasinski

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Complementary and alternative medicine,Pharmacology,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Economics and Econometrics,Urban Studies,Geography, Planning and Development,Global and Planetary Change,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Physics and Astronomy,General Energy,General Engineering,General Materials Science,General Chemistry,Cancer Research,Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous),Molecular Medicine,Physiology,Developmental Biology,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Urban Studies,Environmental Science (miscellaneous),Geography, Planning and Development,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering,Environmental Engineering,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3