Assessment of the impact of prosthetic foot support flexibility on gait in a patient after lower limb amputation at thigh level
-
Published:2021-06-30
Issue:2
Volume:21
Page:56-63
-
ISSN:
-
Container-title:Fizjoterapia Polska
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Fiz Pol
Author:
Curyło Mateusz1, Ciukszo Agnieszka2, Zaczyk Marcin3, Szubski Damian4, Strzępek Łukasz5, Karwat Bolesław6, Raczkowski Jan W.1
Affiliation:
1. Medical University of Lodz, Poland 2. Department of Adapted Physical Activity and Sport, Chair of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland 3. Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Mechatronics, Institute of Micromechanics and Photonics, Department of Precision Devices Construction, Warsaw, Poland 4. Polish Society of Prosthetics and Orthotics of the Locomotor System 5. Bochnia Hospital, Department of General and Trauma Surgery with the Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Bochnia, Poland 6. AGH University of Science And Technology, Kraków, Poland
Abstract
Objective. The article presents the results of experimental studies, the main objective of which was to determine how the degree of flexibility of the lower limb prosthesis support system impacts the pattern of secondarily learned gait in a patient after amputation. Material and methods. The study was carried out on a patient (35-year-old man) after lower limb amputation at the level of 1/3 of the proximal femur, who followed a previously planned walking path. Inclusion criteria: gender F and M, amputation at 1/3 of the proximal femur, age below 40, traumatic amputation, average level of activity, use of a prosthesis for at least one year. Exclusion criteria: age over 40, amputations below 1/3 of the proximal femur, amputations for vascular reasons, activity level below average, use of a prosthesis for under one year. During the study, the patient was equipped with three support systems corresponding to three degrees of flexibility of the prosthetic foot (soft, medium, hard). Biomechanical data during gait was collected using FlexinFit by Sensor Medica for assessing the pressure between the foot and the inside of the shoe. Results. In the entire gait cycle, the support phase on the healthy limb was the longest. The hard support system generates the greatest asymmetry of the transferred loads between the limbs. In this support variant, the difference in load between the healthy limb and the amputated limb was 1,330 kg/m2, which represented an asymmetry of 21%. In terms of load distribution, the best support was medium support – medium support flexibility, for which the difference in load between the healthy limb and the amputated limb was 770 kg/m2, which was an asymmetry of 12%. Conclusions. When designing a prosthesis for people after lower limb amputation, it is crucial to correctly adjust its features to the individual needs of each patient (adjusting prosthesis kinematics, adjusting support system stiffness), so that gait is possibly closest to normal with low energy demand.
Publisher
DJ Studio Dariusz Jasinski
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Complementary and alternative medicine,Pharmaceutical Science,General Engineering,General Medicine,General Medicine,General Materials Science,Computer Science Applications,History,Education,General Medicine,General Chemistry,Applied Mathematics,General Mathematics,General Medicine,General Medicine
Reference23 articles.
1. 1. Behr J., Friedly J., Molton I., Morgenroth D., Jensen M.P., Smith D.G., Pain and pain-related interference in adults with lower-limb amputation: comparison of knee-disarticulation, transtibial, and transfemoral surgical sites, J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 46 (7), 2009: 963-972. 2. 2. Cody L.Mc., Sarah M.Ch., S.J. Morgan, Hafner B.J., Prosthetic limb user experiences with crossover feet: a focus croup study to explore outcomes that matter, Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal: Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal, Vol 1, 2, 2018:1-8. 3. 3. Daven H., Hendrick P., Riberio D., Hale L., Crma L., Asymetrical movements of the lumbopelvic region: is this a potential mechanism for low back pain in people with lower limb amputation, Medical hypotheses 82, 2014:77-85. 4. 4. Degi W., Ortopedia i rehabilitacja, Wybrane zagadnienia z zakresu chorób i urazów narządu ruchu dla studentów i lekarzy, PZWL Wydawnictwo Lekarskie, Warszawa 2015, 5. 5. Desrochers, J.; Frengopoulos, Courtney; Payne, Michael W.C.; Viana, Ricardoc; Hunter, Susan W., Relationship between body image and physical functioning following rehabilitation for lower-limb amputation, Relationship between body image and physical functioning following rehabilitation for lower-limb amputation, International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 2019 – Vol. 42 Issue 1, 85-88.
|
|