COMPARING EQUATING ERRORS ON VARIOUS FACTORS FOR SUBTESTS WHICH HAVE ADDED VALUE

Author:

Uçar Arzu1ORCID,Sünbül Önder2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Hakkari Üniversitesi

2. MERSIN UNIVERSITY

Abstract

In this study dichotomous data which was according with two parameter logistic model (2PLM) was produced for form X and form Y. R 3.1.1. programming language was used to produce data. Each test form had two subtest. Ancor test had two subtest, too. Its’ subtest length was 40% of total test form X (Y). For both forms, corelation between subtests were altered in two level (0.70, 0.80 and 0.90). Moreover, average difficulty difference between subtest of form X and Y were altered in three levels (0.0, 0.4 and 0.7). Simulated forms were equated by using identity, chained linear, Braun/Holland and circle-arc methods for six different sample size (20, 25, 50, 100, 200 and 500) with 100 replications. The results obtained from this simulation study were evaluated based on equating error criterions. The findings indicated in the case when sample size was 100 and more, subtest length was 10, 15 and 30 and the level of average difficulty difference between form 0.0, it was concluded that equating forms would give better results than not equating. Furthermore circle-arc method was found to less equating error than other equating methods under most of the conditions studied.

Publisher

Tugba Yanpar Yelken

Reference21 articles.

1. Albano, A.D. (2016).equate: An R Package for Observed-Score Linking and Equating. R package version 2.0-3. URL http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=equate.

2. Angoff, W. H. (1984). Scales, norms, and equivalent scores. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

3. Baykul, Yaşar (2010). Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme: Klasik Test Teorisi ve Uygulaması. Ankara: Pegem Yayınları

4. Crocker, L. and Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

5. Chu, K. L. & Kamata, A. (2003). Test equating with the presence of DIF. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, Chicago.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3