Limits and Ironies of Transparency: Controlling Corruption in American Elections-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Limits and Ironies of Transparency: Controlling Corruption in American Elections

Published:2019-09-01 Issue:3 Volume:18 Page:282-296
ISSN:1533-1296
Container-title:Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy
language:en
Short-container-title:Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy

Author:

Johnston Michael¹

Affiliation:

1. Michael Johnston is the Charles A. Dana Professor of Political Science Emeritus at Colgate University in Hamilton, New York. Thanks to Adam Graycar, Jennifer Kartner, Bertram J. Levine, Wolfgang Scholl, and three anonymous referees for their perceptive comments, to Oguzhan Dinçer for sharing data on legal and illegal corruption in the 50 states, and to James D'Angelo for several examples of the effects of transparency.

Publisher

Mary Ann Liebert Inc

Subject

Law

Link

https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/pdf/10.1089/elj.2018.0530

Reference49 articles.

1. Enforcement and Public Corruption: Evidence from the American States

2. The Scope of Corruption: Lessons from Comparative Campaign Finance Disclosure

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Transparency and corruption: Measuring real transparency by a new index;Regulation & Governance;2022-11-15

2. ¿Qué condiciones favorecen una transparencia pública efectiva? Artículo de revisión;Revista de Estudios Políticos;2021-12-03

3. Desigualdad, corrupción y Lord Acton;Gestión y Política Pública;2021-10-25

4. O portal da transparência como ferramenta de acompanhamento das bolsas estudantis;Revista Científica Multidisciplinar Núcleo do Conhecimento;2021-01-20

5. Legal corruption?;Public Choice;2020-07-20