Conflicting Goals of Redistricting: Do Districts That Maximize Competition Reckon with Communities of Interest?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Conflicting Goals of Redistricting: Do Districts That Maximize Competition Reckon with Communities of Interest?

Published:2020-12-01 Issue:4 Volume:19 Page:451-471
ISSN:1533-1296
Container-title:Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy
language:en
Short-container-title:Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy

Author:

Gimpel James G.¹,Harbridge-Yong Laurel¹

Affiliation:

1. James G. Gimpel is a professor in the Department of Government and Politics at the University of Maryland in College Park, Maryland, USA. Laurel Harbridge-Yong is an associate professor in the Department of Political Science and a faculty fellow at the Institute for Policy Research at Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois, USA.

Publisher

Mary Ann Liebert Inc

Subject

Law

Link

https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/pdf/10.1089/elj.2019.0576

Reference114 articles.

1. Traditional Districting Principles: Judicial Myths vs. Reality

2. Redistricting by Formula: An Ohio Reform Experiment

3. The Spatial Character of Friendship Formation

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Competing Criteria: Rethinking Congressional Redistricting and Representation;Political Research Quarterly;2024-08-29

2. Bringing spatial interaction measures into multi-criteria assessment of redistricting plans using interactive web mapping;Cartography and Geographic Information Science;2023-10-17

3. Aggregating community maps;Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems;2022-11

4. Representing People and Places: Castaway Voters and the Racial Disparity in Redistricting;Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy;2022-06-01

5. ZIP Codes as Geographic Bases of Representation;Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy;2021-06-01