Investigating Relationships Between Catch Per Unit Effort (CPUE) and Some Angler Characteristics in the Turkish Inland Recreational Fisheries: A Case Study from Uluabat Lake
Author:
ÇAPKIN Kadir1ORCID, CİLBİZ Mehmet2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Eğirdir Su Ürünleri Araştırma Enstitütü Müdürlüğü 2. ISPARTA UYGULAMALI BİLİMLER ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİRDİR SU ÜRÜNLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Abstract
In this study it is aimed that determining effect of some social and demographic properties on Catch Per Unit Effort (CPUE) in Uluabat Lake anglers. A total of 375 interview applied with angler from April 2015 to May 2016 monthly period. Mean CPUE values of each angler was estimated as 1.36 fish/hr (0.08-5.67). Generalized additive models (GAMs) was used for evaluating the data set. Variables used in model were age of angler (X1), experience of angler (X2), annual total fishing day (X3), total value of fishing equipment (X4), monthly total income of anglers (X5), household number of anglers (X6) and CPUE of anglers (Y). Effect of all variables on the CPUE were founded not significant (p>0.05), except “Annual total fishing day” (p>0.05). The variables such as monthly total income of anglers, experience of angler, total value of angling equipment and annual total fishing day positively affected CPUE.
Funder
Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Agriculture and Forest, General Directorate of Agricultural Research and Policies
Publisher
KSU Journal of Agriculture and Nature
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference44 articles.
1. Allen, M. S., Ahrens, R. N. M., Hansen, M. J., & Arlinghaus, R. (2013). Dynamic angling effort influences the value of minimum-length limits to prevent recruitment overfishing. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 20(2-3), 247-257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2400.2012.00871.x 2. Almodóvar, A., & Nicola, G. G. (1998). Assessment of a brown trout Salmo trutta population in the River Gallo (central Spain): Angling effects and management implications (Salmonidae). Italian Journal of Zoology, 65(SUPPL.), 539-543. https://doi.org/10.1080/11250009809386881 3. Anonymous (2020) The circular No. 2020/21, regulating the amateur fisheries in 2020-2024, 17 pp., The Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Ankara, Türkiye, Official paper no: 31221 (In Turkish). https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/ mevzuat? MevzuatNo=34822& MevzuatTur=9&MevzuatTertip=5 4. Anonymous (2013). A socio-ecomomic analysis of center and west anatolian inland fishermen. (Unpublished project final report). Republic of Türkiye, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, General Directory of Agricultural Research and Policies. 90p. Isparta. 5. Arlinghaus, R., Cooke, S. J., Lyman, J., Policansky, D., Schwab, A., Suski, C., Sutton, S. G., & Thorstad, E. B. (2007). Understanding the Complexity of Catch-and-Release in Recreational Fishing: An Integrative Synthesis of Global Knowledge from Historical, Ethical, Social, and Biological Perspectives. Reviews in Fisheries Science, 15(1-2), 75-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641260601149432
|
|