Effect of Different Irrigation Water Levels on Yield and Quality Parameters of Fodder Beet

Author:

HAKIRUWIZERA Emmanuel1ORCID,UÇAR Yusuf2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. ISPARTA UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES

2. ISPARTA UYGULAMALI BİLİMLER ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ

Abstract

The study was carried out at Isparta University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Agricultural Research and Application Farm in 2021, with aim of determining the effect of different irrigation water levels on the yield and quality parameters of fodder beet by the experiment of randomized complete block design with three replications. The study used Rota fodder beet variety. Applied irrigation water amounts were determined according to Penman-Montheith method by consıdering the total reference crop evapotranspiration (ETo) of ten days for five different ratios (S1: ETo×1.20, S2: ETo×0.90, S3: ETo×0.60, S4: ETo×0.30; S5: ETo×0.00). The irrigation method used was drip. Applied irrigation mounts ranged between 131.9 mm - 643.6 mm. Crop water consumption (ET) ranged between 337.1 mm - 782 mm. According to the subjects, fresh leaf yield varied 570 – 1788.1 kg da-1, fresh root yield varied 1865.7 – 7838.8 kg da-1, total fresh yield varied 2435.8 – 9626.9 kg da-1, leaf dry matter yield varied 134.1 – 255.5 kg da-1, root dry mater varied 469.9 – 1247.6 kg da-1, tuber length varied 12.2 cm – 25.4 cm, and tuber diameter varied 6.5 – 12.4 cm. The yield response factor (ky) was 1.04. The water use efficiency was 72.3 – 145.0 kg ha-1 mm-1, the irrigation water use efficiency was 111.7 – 157.5 kg ha-1 mm-1. The S2 irrigation treatment was the most appropriate irrigation program under adequate irrigation water conditions. In terms of irrigation deficit conditions, results indicated that there may apply irrigation water at 60% or 30% of reference evapotranspiration from S3 or S4 irrigation program.

Publisher

KSU Journal of Agriculture and Nature

Subject

General Medicine

Reference43 articles.

1. Abdallah, E. F. &Yassen, A. A. (2008). Fodder beet productivity under fertilization treatments and water augmentation. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 2(2), 282-287.

2. Acar, R. (2000). Bazı Yemlik Pancar (Beta Vulgaris L. Rapacea koch.) Çeşitlerinde Farklı Ekim Zamanı ve Bitki Sıklıkları Uygulamalarının Verim, Verim Unsurları ve Kalite Üzerine Etkileri. (Doktora Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü).

3. Acar, R., Koç, N. & Direk, M. (2020). Süt hayvancılığında alternatif kaba yem olarak hayvan pancarının kullanılması. Tarlasera Dergesi, 95, 94-96

4. Açıkgöz, E., Hatipoğlu, R., Altınok, S., Sancak, C., Tan, A. & Uraz, D. (2005). Yem bitkileri üretimi ve sorunları. Ziraat Mühendisliği VI. Teknik Kongresi, Türkiye, ss.503-518.

5. Akgül, M. & Başyiğit, L. (2005). Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi çiftlik arazisinin detaylı toprak etüdü ve haritalanması. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(3), 1-10.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3