Abstract
When considering the circulation of European films across Europe within a post-national framework, an investigation on the role of national institutes for culture could offer a particular take on the “Europeanisation” (Carpentier 2021) process through cinema-related initiatives. If they were conceived to promote national heritage and values, they have found themselves in the ambivalent position of pursuing their main goal within a changing institutional and cultural context that requires more integrated approaches, since the beginning of the 1990s, namely after the end of the Cold War. Notably, since the creation of the European National Institutes for Culture network (hereafter EUNIC) in 2006, they have been asked to cooperate and to valorise the heterogeneity and multiplicity of European subjectivities and communities, according to the motto “unity in diversity” (Liz 2016; Bondebjerg, Novrup Redvall, and Higson 2014). In particular, this research concentrates on the circulation, among European and Italian institutes for culture, of films that deal with European issues, and has reflected on how they affect the construction of a transnational European identity by addressing sensitive topics.
Reference27 articles.
1. Avezzù, Giorgio. 2022. L’Italia che guarda. Geografie del consumo audiovisivo. Rome: Carocci.
2. Biltereyst Daniel, and Eduard Cuelenaere. WP1.3. Region Report: European Movie Market Report. EUMEPLAT project.
3. Brunetta, Gian Piero. 2020. L’Italia sullo schermo. Come il cinema ha raccontato l’identità italiana, Rome: Carocci.
4. Bondebjerg, Ib, Eva Novrup Redvall, and Andrew Higson, eds. 2014. European Cinema and Television. Cultural Policy and Everyday Life. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
5. Comand, Mariapia, and Roy Menarini. 2014. Il cinema europeo. Bari: Laterza.