REHABILITATION PROGRAM DURATION AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN PROFESSIONAL AND RECREATIONAL ATHLETES
Author:
Bojičić Samir1, Jaganjac Amila1, Katana Bakir1, Erović Vranešić Adela1, Kaljić Eldad1, Konjo Hadžan1, Trtak Namik1, Umičević Tanja1
Affiliation:
1. University of Sarajevo - Faculty of Health Studies, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Abstract
Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament injury is an injury that occurs in both sexes and in the population of all ages. The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a very strong internal ligament of the knee, whose injuries occur frequently in athletes (professional and recreational) and after which the recovery is very long and complicated. The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of a standardized rehabilitation program after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction based on the time required for rehabilitation in athletes and recreational athletes.
Methods: Research is designed as prospective study. The research was conducted in Polyclinic FM Sarajevo over a period of 10 months, starting in June 2018 and ending in March 2019. The collection of data required for the study was carried out using a form prepared for the analysis of patients included in the study.
Results: Thirty-six people participated in the study, divided into two groups. In the first group, 52.8% belonged to recreational athletes, while in the second group, 47.2% belonged to athletes. At the end of the study, the flexion value in both studied groups was 120º. At the end of the study, the percentage of subjects with correct extension of the injured limb was 94.7% of recreational athletes and 64.7% of athletes. Of the total number of respondents included in this study, 33% were soccer players, 14% were basketball players, and 53% were recreational athletes. Conclusion: Based on the research results, it was confirmed that early rehabilitation after the established rehabilitation treatment program is shorter in recreational athletes than in professional athletes.
Reference19 articles.
1. Adams, D., Logerstedt, D. S., Hunter-Giordano, A., Axe, M. J., & Snyder-Mackler, L. (2012). Current concepts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a criterion-based rehabilitation progression. The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 42(7), 601–614. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.3871 2. Ahldén, M., Kartus, J., Ejerhed, L., Karlsson, J., & Sernert, N. (2009). Knee laxity measurements after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, using either bone-patellar-tendon-bone or hamstring tendon autografts, with special emphasis on comparison over time. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy: Official Journal of the ESSKA, 17(9), 1117–1124. doi:10.1007/s00167-009-0846-5 3. Cimino, F., Volk, B. S., & Setter, D. (2010). Anterior cruciate ligament injury: diagnosis, management, and prevention. American Family Physician, 82(8), 917–922. 4. Dubois, B., & Esculier, J.-F. (2020). Soft-tissue injuries simply need PEACE and LOVE. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 54(2), 72–73. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2019-101253 5. Emami Meybodi, M. K., Jannesari, M., Rahim Nia, A., Yaribeygi, H., Sobhani Firoozabad, V., & Dorostegan, A. (2013). Knee flexion strength before and after ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendon autografts. Trauma Monthly, 18(3), 130–133. doi:10.5812/traumamon.12813
|
|