Within-Visit Blood Pressure Variability and All-Cause and Stroke Mortality: Thai Epidemiologic Stroke Study

Author:

Hanchaiphiboolkul SuchatORCID,Puthkhao Pimchanok,Tantirittisak Tasanee,Na Songkhla Krida,Komonchan Surasak,Worakijthamrongchai Thanaboon,Thiraworawong Thon

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The association between within-visit blood pressure variability (BPV) and all-cause and stroke mortality remains uncertain. The aim of our study was to assess the association of within-visit BPV with all-cause and stroke mortality. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The study was conducted among participants from Thai Epidemiologic Stroke Study, which is a prospective community-based cohort study that recruited participants from the general population from five regions of Thailand. This study included 19,614 participants aged 45–80 years, who were free of stroke and had three blood pressure (BP) measurements, taken 1 min apart, at baseline. Within-visit systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) variability were expressed as the maximum absolute difference (MAD) between any two readings among the three repeated sequential measurements of SBP and DBP, respectively. The participants were followed up for mortality. Cox regression analysis was used to identify the association of within-visit BPV with all-cause and stroke mortality. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals were used to illustrate the associations. Sensitivity analysis restricted to participants with mean SBP above 130 mm Hg and mean DBP above 90 mm Hg (<i>n</i> = 1,895) was performed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> During a median follow-up of 11.1 years, 305 participants died of stroke, and 3,173 participants died of nonstroke cause. In unadjusted analyses, high within-visit MAD of SBP was significantly associated with all-cause (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.09–1.31; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) and stroke mortality (HR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.35–2.59; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001); high within-visit MAD of DBP was also significantly associated with all-cause mortality (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.08–1.31; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001), in quartile 4 versus quartile 1. These associations did not persist after further adjustment for sex, age, and other potential confounders including mean BP. However, sensitivity analysis showed some inconsistent results regarding associations of within-visit MAD of SBP and DBP with all-cause and stroke mortality, respectively. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> In general population, within-visit systolic BPV and within-visit diastolic BPV do not have prognostic significance on stroke mortality and all-cause mortality, respectively.

Publisher

S. Karger AG

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Epidemiology

Reference28 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3