Outcomes of Adolescents and Young Adults Compared with Children with Acute Leukemia after Single-Unit Unrelated Cord Blood Transplantation Using Myeloablative Conditioning without Antithymocyte Globulin

Abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Although the use of cord blood transplantation (CBT) is becoming more frequent in acute leukemia, considering the relationship between the low stem cell dose and graft failure, whether use of CBT for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) is appropriate remains uncertain. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A retrospective registry-based analysis of clinical outcomes and immune reconstitution was conducted for 105 AYAs and 187 children with acute leukemia who underwent single-unit CBT using myeloablative conditioning (MAC) without antithymocyte globulin (ATG). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Outcomes were similar between AYAs and children, except for nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and recovery rates of neutrophils and platelets. The 30-day cumulative incidence of neutrophil engraftment was similar between AYAs and children, but children had faster rates of neutrophil and platelet recovery than AYAs. The median time to neutrophil engraftment was earlier in children than in AYAs (AYAs, 19 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] 17.3–21.7; children, 16 days, 95% CI 13.1–19.5, <i>p =</i> 0.00003). The incidence of platelet recovery on day 120 was higher in children than in AYAs (AYAs, 80%, 95% CI 71–81%; children, 88%, 95% CI 82–92%, <i>p =</i> 0.037). CD34⁺ cell dose was the only independent factor influencing both neutrophil and platelet recovery. The cumulative incidence of NRM at 2 years was higher among AYAs than among children (AYAs, 27.5%, 95% CI 20–37%; children, 15%, 95% CI 10–21%, <i>p =</i> 0.008). Conditioning regimen was an independent factor influencing NRM. With respect to immune reconstitution, natural killer cell counts quickly recovered to normal levels 1-month post-CBT in both children and AYAs. CD8⁺ T-cell counts were higher in children than in AYAs at 1 and 3 months post-CBT. CD4⁺ T-cell counts were similar in both children and AYAs after CBT. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> AYAs with acute leukemia have outcomes of single-unit CBT using MAC without ATG that are as good as those of children. Thus, single-unit CBT using modified MAC without ATG is an acceptable choice for both AYAs and children who do not have a suitable donor.