Cerebral Oxygenation during Neonatal Intubation with Nasal High Flow: A Sub-Study of the SHINE Randomized Trial

Author:

Van Der Veeken Ellyn,Manley Brett James,Owen LouiseORCID,Kamlin Omar,Roberts Calum,Newman Sophie,Francis KateORCID,Donath Susan,Davis Peter,Cuzzilla Rocco,Hodgson Kate Alison

Abstract

Introduction: Nasal high flow (nHF) improves the likelihood of successful neonatal intubation on the first attempt without physiological instability. The effect of nHF on cerebral oxygenation is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare cerebral oxygenation during endotracheal intubation in neonates receiving nHF and those receiving standard care. Methods: A sub-study of a multicentre randomized trial of nHF during neonatal endotracheal intubation. A subset of infants had near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) monitoring. Eligible infants were randomly assigned to nHF or standard care during the first intubation attempt. NIRS sensors provided continuous regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rScO2) monitoring. The procedure was video recorded, and peripheral oxygen saturation and rScO2 data were extracted at 2-second intervals. The primary outcome was the average difference in rScO2 from baseline during the first intubation attempt. Secondary outcomes included average rScO2 and rate of change of rScO2. Results: Nineteen intubations were analyzed (11 nHF; 8 standard care). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) postmenstrual age was 27 (26.5–29) weeks, and weight was 828 (716–1,135) g. Median change in rScO2 from baseline was −1.5% (−5.3 to 0.0) in the nHF group and −9.4% (−19.6 to −4.5) in the standard care group. rScO2 fell more slowly in infants managed with nHF compared with standard care: median (IQR) rScO2 change −0.08 (−0.13 to 0.00) % per second and −0.36 (−0.66 to −0.22) % per second, respectively. Conclusions: In this small sub-study, regional cerebral oxygen saturation was more stable in neonates who received nHF during intubation compared with standard care.

Publisher

S. Karger AG

Subject

Developmental Biology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3