Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate versus Plasmakinetic Enucleation of the Prostate in the Treatment of Massive Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Author:

Zhang Jian,Wang Yonghui,Li Shuang,Jin Shipeng,Zhang Shiqing,Zhao Chunli,Yang Wenzeng,Cui Shujin,Liu Yuexin

Abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common chronic progressive disease resulting in urinary obstruction in aging men. It comes to more and more patients with massive BPH with the aging of society and extension of life expectancy. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> The aim of the study was to compare the clinical efficacy, safety, and complications between transurethral bipolar plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in the treatment of massive BPH. <b><i>Design and Setting:</i></b> Patients with BPH were divided into the PKEP group and the TURP group randomly. Intraoperative blood loss (BL), operation time (OT), resected tissue weight (RTW), gland resection ratio (GRR), postoperative indwelling ureter time (IUT), bladder fistula time (BFT) and hospital stay time (HST), preoperative and postoperative serum sodium concentration (SSC), hemoglobin concentration (HGB), prostate weight (PW), postvoid residual (PVR), maximum urinary flow rate (<i>Q</i><sub>max</sub>), international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life (QOL), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), and other complications were analyzed and compared respectively. <b><i>Results:</i></b> There was no statistical difference in preoperative IPSS, preoperative QOL score, preoperative PVR, preoperative <i>Q</i><sub>max</sub>, postoperative QOL score, postoperative PVR, postoperative <i>Q</i><sub>max</sub>, IPSS difference value (DV), <i>Q</i><sub>max</sub> DV, and PVR DV between the PKEP group and the TURP group (<i>p</i> &#x3e; 0.05). OT, BL, IUT, BFT, HST, and postoperative IPSS in the PKEP group were significantly lower than that in the TURP group (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.01). RTW and GRR in the PKEP group were significantly higher than that in the TURP group (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.01). QOL DV in the PKEP group was higher than that in the TURP group (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05). There was statistical difference in SSC DV between the PKEP group and the TURP group (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05). There was significant statistical difference in postoperative PW, postoperative HGB, PW DV, and HGB DV between the PKEP group and the TURP group (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.01). There was significant statistical difference in IPSS, QOL, PVR, and <i>Q</i><sub>max</sub> between postoperative value and preoperative value in both groups (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.01). The incidence of transurethral resection syndrome, obturator nerve reflex, transient urinary incontinence, and retrograde ejaculation between the PKEP group and the TURP group has no statistical difference (<i>p</i> &#x3e; 0.05). Capsule perforation, blood transfusion, secondary hemorrhage, bladder neck contracture, and urethral stricture in the PKEP group were lower than that in the TURP group (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05). Bladder spasm in the PKEP group was significantly lower than that in the TURP group (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.01). There was no statistical difference in preoperative and postoperative IIEF-5, effective erectile frequency, telotism average tension, sustainable telotism average time, and sexual dissatisfaction between the PKEP group and the TURP group (<i>p</i> &#x3e; 0.05). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> PKEP and TURP have similar clinical efficacy in the treatment of massive BPH. PKEP has advantages in shorter OT, less BL, more GRR, and fewer complications, but the long-term therapeutic effect of PKEP needs further follow-up.

Publisher

S. Karger AG

Subject

Urology

Reference23 articles.

1. Chughtai B, Forde JC, Thomas DD, Laor L, Hossack T, Woo HH, et al. Benign prostatic hyperplasia. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16031.

2. Kim EH, Larson JA, Andriole GL. Management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Annu Rev Med. 2016;67:137.

3. Namdarian B, Willder S, Steele G, Leona R, Grills R. Establishment of a urology service in a developing country: an observational study of outcomes in transurethral prostate resection procedures in Vanuatu. Lancet. 2015;385(Suppl 2):S26.

4. Li Z, Chen P, Wang J, Mao Q, Xiang H, Wang X, et al. The impact of surgical treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia on male erectile function: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Medicine. 2016;95(24):e3862.

5. Zou Z, Xu A, Zheng S, Chen B, Xu Y, Li H, et al. Dual-centre randomized-controlled trial comparing transurethral endoscopic enucleation of the prostate using diode laser vs. bipolar plasmakinetic for the treatment of LUTS secondary of benign prostate obstruction: 1-year follow-up results. World J Urol. 2018;36(7):1117.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3