Gliomatosis Cerebri Growth Pattern: Association of Differential First-Line Treatment with Overall Survival in WHO Grade II and III Gliomas

Author:

Divé IrisORCID,Steidl Eike,Wagner Marlies,Filipski Katharina,Burger Michael C.,Franz Kea,Harter Patrick N.,Bähr Oliver,Fokas Emmanouil,Herrlinger Ulrich,Steinbach Joachim P.

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Gliomatosis cerebri (GC) is defined by diffuse, widespread glial tumor growth affecting three or more cerebral lobes. Previous studies in gliomas found no distinct histological or molecular GC subtype, yet the presence of GC is associated with worse median overall survival (OS). Here, we explored whether differing therapeutic strategies in first-line treatment could account for this. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> From our University Cancer Center database, 47 patients with histological diagnosis of WHO grade II or III glioma and GC imaging pattern were identified. GC criteria were confirmed by independent review. Patients with WHO grade II or III glioma with non-GC pattern served as control cohort (<i>n</i> = 343). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Within the GC patient cohort, lower WHO grade, mutated isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) status, and absence of contrast enhancement were associated with better OS. Compared to the control cohort, patients with GC had significantly shorter OS independent of histological diagnosis or IDH1 mutation status. Patients with GC preferentially received chemotherapy alone (62 vs. 18%), and less frequently radiochemotherapy (21 vs. 27%). OS was significantly shorter in the GC cohort compared to the non-GC cohort both for chemotherapy (3.9 vs. 7.6 years, <i>p</i> = 0.0085) and for combined radiochemotherapy (1.1 vs. 8.4 years, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001). However, when only patients who received biopsy plus chemotherapy were analyzed, the differences lost statistical significance (3.5 vs. 6.6 years, <i>p</i> = 0.196). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> We found major differences in the selection of first-line therapies of GC versus non-GC patients. Our results suggest that these differences may partly account for the worse prognosis of GC patients.

Publisher

S. Karger AG

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology,General Medicine

Reference28 articles.

1. Nevin S. Gliomatosis cerebri. Brain. 1938;61(2):170–91.

2. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Burger PC, Jouvet A, et al. The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol. 2007;114(2):97–109.

3. Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, Cavenee WK, et al. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131(6):803–20.

4. Maharaj MM, Phan K, Xu J, Fairhall J, Reddy R, Rao PJV. Gliomatosis cerebri: prognosis based on current molecular markers. J Clin Neurosci. 2017;43:1–5.

5. Herrlinger U, Jones DTW, Glas M, Hattingen E, Gramatzki D, Stuplich M, et al. Gliomatosis cerebri: no evidence for a separate brain tumor entity. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131(2):309–19.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3