Comparative Impact of Isolated Ultrafiltration and Hemodialysis on Fluid Distribution: A Bioimpedance Study

Author:

Akiyama Yuki,Matsuoka Ryo,Masuda Takahiro,Iwamoto Sumiya,Sugie Shun,Muto Takafumi,Miyamoto Yuka,Ohdate Takayuki,Nakagawa Saki,Okada Mari,Imai Toshimi,Komada Takanori,Suzuki Michiko,Maeshima Akito,Akimoto Tetsu,Saito Osamu,Nagata Daisuke

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Isolated ultrafiltration (IUF) is an alternative treatment for diuretic-resistant patients with fluid retention. Although hemodialysis (HD) predominantly decreases extracellular water (ECW), the impact of IUF on fluid distribution compared with HD remains unclear. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We compared the effect of HD (<i>n</i> = 22) and IUF (<i>n</i> = 10) sessions on the body fluid status using a bioimpedance analysis device (InBody S10). <b><i>Results:</i></b> The total ultrafiltration volume was similar between HD and IUF (HD 2.5 ± 0.3 vs. ICF 2.1 ± 0.3 L/session, <i>p</i> = 0.196). The reduction rate of ECW was significantly higher than that of intracellular water (ICW) after HD (ECW −7.9% ± 0.8% vs. ICW −3.0% ± 0.9%, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) and IUF (ECW −5.8% ± 0.9% vs. ICW -3.6% ± 0.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.048). However, the change in the ratio of ECW to total body water in HD was significantly larger than that in IUF (HD −3.2% ± 0.3% vs. ICF −1.1% ± 0.4%, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). The reduction rates in serum tonicity (effective osmolality) were higher after HD than after IUF (HD −1.8% ± 0.5% vs. IUF −0.6% ± 0.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.052). Among the components of effective osmolality, the reduction rates of serum K<sup>+</sup> and glucose levels after HD were significantly higher than those after IUF (serum K<sup>+</sup>: HD −30.5% ± 1.6% vs. IUF −0.5% ± 3.8%, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001; serum glucose: HD −15.4% ± 5.0% vs. IUF 0.7% ± 4.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.026), while the serum Na<sup>+</sup> level was slightly and similarly reduced (HD −0.8% ± 0.4% vs. IUF −0.8% ± 0.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.500). The reduction in the osmolal gap value (measured osmolality–calculated osmolarity) was significantly greater after HD sessions than after IUF sessions (HD −12.4 ± 1.4 vs. IUF 2.0 ± 1.0 mOsm/kg, <i>p</i> = 0.001). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The extracellular fluid reduction effect of HD is stronger than that of IUF. The different changes in effective osmolality and osmolal gap after HD and IUF sessions may be related to the different effects of HD and IUF on fluid distribution.

Publisher

S. Karger AG

Subject

Nephrology,Hematology,General Medicine

Reference37 articles.

1. Canaud B, Bowry SK, Tetta C, Gatti E. The case for treating refractory congestive heart failure with ultrafiltration. Blood Purif. 2014 Sep;37 Suppl 2:51–60.

2. Costanzo MR, Ronco C, Abraham WT, Agostoni P, Barasch J, Fonarow GC, et al. Extracorporeal Ultrafiltration for fluid overload in heart failure: current status and prospects for further research. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 May;69(19):2428–45.

3. Davenport A. Ultrafiltration in diuretic-resistant volume overload in nephrotic syndrome and patients with ascites due to chronic liver disease. Cardiology. 2001 Jan;96(3–4):190–5.

4. Fauchald P, Noddeland H, Norseth J. An evaluation of ultrafiltration as treatment of diuretic-resistant oedema in nephrotic syndrome. Acta Med Scand. 1985 Jan;217(1):127–31.

5. Asaba H, Bergström J, Fürst P, Shaldon S, Wiklund S. Treatment of diuretic-resistant fluid retention with ultrafiltration. Acta Med Scand. 1978 Jan;204(3):145–9.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3