Clinical Efficacy and Safety of <b><i>Artesimia annua</i></b>-Sublingual Immunotherapy in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Patients Based on Different Intervention Time

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Artemisia is a major kind of grass pollen in Northern China that can cause multiple kinds of common allergic diseases, such as allergic rhinitis (AR), conjunctivitis, or asthma. Recently, <i>Artemisia annua</i> Allergens Sublingual Immunotherapy Drops have been proved effective and safe for treating seasonal AR (SAR) with or without allergic conjunctivitis patients and were available in China. We sought to further investigate the different intervention times of <i>A. annua</i>-sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for evaluating efficacy and safety in patients with SAR. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A total of 88 subjects aged 18–52 years with SAR were enrolled and randomized into the SLIT group and control group. Forty-five patients received a course of SLIT with <i>A. annua</i> extracts along with pharmacotherapy as SLIT group and 43 patients only used symptomatic drugs as control group. Furthermore, SLIT group was randomly divided into 12–13 weeks’ pre-seasonal treatment group and 8–9 weeks’ pre-seasonal treatment group to receive different duration of SLIT before pollen season. Monosensitized and polysensitized groups were also the subgroups of SLIT group according to the sensitization status of patients. The combined symptom and medication score (CSMS), total nasal symptom score (TNSS), total medication score (TMS), visual analog score (VAS) were evaluated during the peak pollen phase in 2020 and 2021, respectively. Safety was assessed according to adverse events (AEs) reported. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Compared to control group, CSMS, TNSS, TMS, VAS were significantly improved during the course of SLIT (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). Besides, clinical improvement in nasal symptoms and reduction of medication use was also observed in SLIT group, compared to the baseline value (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). Meanwhile, we observed that there was no significant difference between monosensitized group (<i>n</i> = 8) and polysensitized group (<i>n</i> = 29), as well as 12–13 weeks’ preseasonal treatment group (<i>n</i> = 20) and 8–9 weeks’ pre-seasonal treatment group (<i>n</i> = 17) belonging to the SLIT group in clinical efficacy (<i>p</i> &#x3e; 0.05). No severe systemic AEs were reported. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> This study proved that <i>A. annua</i>-SLIT can provide equivalent efficacy and safety for SAR patients under the circumstance of accepting the pre-seasonal treatment of 8–9 or 12–13 weeks, regardless of monosensitization or polysensitization.