An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Pemetrexed-Carboplatin versus (Weekly) Paclitaxel-Carboplatin as First-Line Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Author:

Yadav Ajay,Malik Prabhat SinghORCID,Khurana Sachin,Jain Deepali,Vishnubhatla Sreenivas,Yadav Mukesh,Pathy Sushmita,Mohan Anant,Kumar Lalit

Abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Before the approval of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors, platinum doublets were the standard of care in patients with treatment-naïve advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without targetable driver mutations. Pemetrexed-platinum combinations are preferred in non-squamous NSCLC. However, there has been no direct comparison to paclitaxel-carboplatin. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This open-label randomized trial was designed to compare pemetrexed-carboplatin with (weekly) paclitaxel-carboplatin in treatment-naïve advanced/metastatic non-squamous NSCLC without driver mutations. Patients received either pemetrexed 500 mg/m<sup>2</sup> and carboplatin AUC 5 every 3 weeks, or paclitaxel 80 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 1, day 8, and day 15 with carboplatin AUC 5 every 4 weeks for 4 cycles. Patients in both arms were allowed to receive pemetrexed maintenance. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 180 patients were enrolled. The study was terminated early; however, at the time of analysis 75.8% of the required events had occurred. Finally, 164 patients were evaluable, 83 in the pemetrexed arm and 81 in the paclitaxel arm. After a median follow-up of 17 months, progression-free survival (PFS) rates at 6 months were not different in the two treatment arms (47.45 vs. 48.64%, <i>p</i> = 0.88). The median PFS values were 5.67 months (95% CI 3.73–7.3) and 5.03 months (95% CI 2.63–7.43) in each arm, respectively (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.81–1.59, <i>p</i> = 0.44). The median overall survival was also not different: 14.83 months (95% CI 9.5–18.73) and 11.3 (95% CI 8.3–19.7; HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.8–1.78, <i>p</i> = 0.37). All grade toxicities were similar except for alopecia and peripheral neuropathy, which were higher in the paclitaxel arm. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Pemetrexed-carboplatin is not superior to (weekly) paclitaxel-carboplatin as the first-line regimen in advanced non-squamous NSCLC in terms of PFS.

Publisher

S. Karger AG

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology,General Medicine

Reference10 articles.

1. Scagliotti GV, Parikh P, von Pawel J, Biesma B, Vansteenkiste J, Manegold C, et al. Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 20;26(21):3543–51.

2. Paz-Ares L, de Marinis F, Dediu M, Thomas M, Pujol JL, Bidoli P, et al. Maintenance therapy with pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care after induction therapy with pemetrexed plus cisplatin for advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (PARAMOUNT): a double-blind, phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(3):247–55.

3. Langer CJ, Paz-Ares LG, Wozniak AJ, Gridelli C, de Marinis F, Pujol JL, et al. Safety analyses of pemetrexed-cisplatin and pemetrexed maintenance therapies in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC: retrospective analyses from 2 phase iii studies. Clin Lung Cancer. 2017;18(5):489–96.

4. Grønberg BH, Bremnes RM, Fløtten O, Amundsen T, Brunsvig PF, Hjelde HH, et al. Phase III study by the Norwegian lung cancer study group: pemetrexed plus carboplatin compared with gemcitabine plus carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(19):3217–24.

5. Patel JD, Socinski MA, Garon EB, Reynolds CH, Spigel DR, Olsen MR, et al. PointBreak: a randomized phase III study of pemetrexed plus carboplatin and bevacizumab followed by maintenance pemetrexed and bevacizumab versus paclitaxel plus carboplatin and bevacizumab followed by maintenance bevacizumab in patients with stage IIIB or IV nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(34):4349–57.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3