Survival Outcomes of Mohs Surgery versus Wide Local Excision for Less Common Nonmelanoma Skin Cancers: A Stabilized Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Analysis

Author:

Chen Ming,Yunqiong Wang Yunqiong

Abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Compared with wide local excision (WLE), Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) can not only remove the tumor tissue but also ensure a negative margin. However, there is limited evidence on whether there is a difference in prognosis between the two techniques for less common nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs). <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> The aim of our study was to compare the survival outcomes of MMS and WLE for less common NMSCs. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This study retrospectively analyzed data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results dataset between 2003 and 2018. The less common NMSCs include Merkel cell carcinoma, skin appendage neoplasm, fibromatous malignancy, and other rare NMSCs. The stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (SIPTW) and the Kaplan-Meier methods were adopted to assess the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Furthermore, the Cox proportional hazards, Fine-and-Gray regression analysis, and subgroup analysis models were applied to examine the effects of MMS versus WLE based on all-cause and cancer-specific mortality. <b><i>Results:</i></b> We identified 6,582 individuals with less common NMSCs for survival analysis, among which 1,946 patients (29.5%) had undergone MMS and 4,636 (70.5%) had received WLE. Diseases diagnosed in the most recent year, older age, the White race, married status, eyelid/face site, small tumor size, and localized disease were factors significantly associated with MMS treatment. Compared with the WLE group, the MMS group had comparable OS before and after the SIPTW analysis. Additionally, after adjusting for other confounding covariates, the surgery type (WLE vs. MMS) did not show significant associations with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94–1.14, <i>p</i> = 0.517) and disease-specific mortality (HR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.95–1.42, <i>p</i> = 0.134). Moreover, the subgroup analysis validated these findings. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> MMS and WLE have comparable OS and CSS for less common NMSCs.

Publisher

S. Karger AG

Subject

Dermatology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3