Cell-Free DNA Testing: What Is the Reason Why High-Risk Women Choose It?

Author:

Benítez-Quintanilla Leticia,Pauta MontseORCID,Matas Isabel,Madrigal Irene,Borrell Antoni

Abstract

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> The aim of the study wasto describe the past medical history, sociodemographic, and pregnancy characteristics of women at high risk for aneuploidy and to determine which factors are related to her choice of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing instead of invasive diagnostic testing. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We conducted a prospective descriptive study including pregnant women from the Western Barcelona public health area at high risk for fetal aneuploidy, defined as a trisomy 21 or 18 risk between 1/10 and 1/250 at the combined first-trimester or at the second-trimester biochemical screening. During 1 year (December 2018 to November 2019), these women were asked to fill in a confidential questionnaire about her past medical history, demographic and pregnancy characteristics, and her opinion about termination of the pregnancy after a counseling consultation with a maternal-fetal medicine specialist in which advantages and disadvantages of both testing methods, cfDNA or diagnostic testing, were discussed. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine which factors were related with cfDNA uptake. <b><i>Results:</i></b> During the study period, 82 pregnant women filled the questionnaire. The median maternal age was 39.6 years (interquartile range [IQR] 37.3–40.9 years), and 73 (89%) of them were 35 years or older. Forty-three (52%) women opted for cfDNA testing, while 39 (48%) chose invasive diagnosis. In a logistic regression analysis, the use of assisted reproductive techniques (OR 13.03; 95% CI: 1.47–115.56; <i>p</i> = 0.021) and Latin American origin (OR 6.66; 95% CI 1.73–25.66; <i>p</i> = 0.006) were shown to be related to a higher cfDNA uptake. In contrast, nonreligious women (OR 0.21; 95% CI: 0.06–0.72; <i>p</i> = 0.013) and a favorable opinion about termination of pregnancy (OR 0.23; 95% CI: 0.06–0.92; <i>p</i> = 0.037) were related with a lower uptake. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Half of the pregnant women at high risk for fetal aneuploidy opted for cfDNA testing. The main reason to choose cfDNA was avoiding the risk of pregnancy loss. Women using assisted reproductive techniques and those of Latin American origin preferred cfDNA testing, while nonreligious women and those with a favorable opinion on termination pregnancy preferred invasive testing.

Publisher

S. Karger AG

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Embryology,General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference16 articles.

1. Nicolaides KH, Syngelaki A, Ashoor , G, Birdir C, Touzet G Noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal trisomies in a routinely screened first-trimester population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(5):374–6.

2. Norton ME, Brar H, Weiss J, Karimi A, Laurent LC, Caughey AB, et al. Non-Invasive Chromosomal Evaluation (NICE) Study: results of a multicenter prospective cohort study for detection of fetal trisomy 21 and trisomy 18. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(2):137–8.

3. Akolekar R, Beta J, Picciarelli G, Ogilvie C, D’Antonio F. Procedure-related risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jan;45(1):16–26.

4. van der Meij KRM, Sistermans EA, Macville MVE, Stevens SJC, Bax CJ, Bekker MN, et al. TRIDENT-2: national implementation of genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing as a first-tier screening test in the Netherlands. Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Dec 5;105(6):1091–101.

5. Brady P, Brison N, Van Den Bogaert K, de Ravel T, Peeters H, Van Esch H, et al. Clinical implementation of NIPT: technical and biological challenges. Clin Genet. 2016 May;89(5):523–30.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3