Short-Term versus Long-Term Mentalization-Based Therapy for Borderline Personality Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial (MBT-RCT)

Author:

Juul Sophie,Jakobsen Janus Christian,Hestbaek Emilie,Jørgensen Caroline Kamp,Olsen Markus Harboe,Rishede Marie,Frandsen Frederik Weischer,Bo Sune,Lunn Susanne,Poulsen Stig,Sørensen Per,Bateman Anthony,Simonsen Sebastian

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a severe and prevalent psychiatric disorder. Mentalization-based therapy (MBT) is an evidence-based intervention for BPD, and several countries offer treatment programs for BPD lasting for years, which is resource demanding. No previous trial has compared short-term with long-term MBT. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety of short-term versus long-term MBT for outpatients with BPD. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Adult outpatients (≥18 years) with subthreshold or diagnosed BPD were randomly assigned (1:1) to short-term MBT (5 months) or long-term MBT (14 months). The primary outcome was BPD symptoms assessed with the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder. Secondary outcomes were functional impairment, quality of life, global functioning, and severe self-harm. All outcomes were primarily assessed at 16 months after randomization. This trial was prospectively registered at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://ClinicalTrials.gov" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">ClinicalTrials.gov</ext-link>, NCT03677037. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Between October 4, 2018, and December 3, 2020, we randomly assigned 166 participants to short-term MBT (<i>n</i> = 84) or long-term MBT (<i>n</i> = 82). Regression analyses showed no evidence of a difference when assessing BPD symptoms (MD 0.99; 95% CI: −1.06 to 3.03; <i>p</i> = 0.341), level of functioning (MD 1.44; 95% CI: −1.43 to 4.32; <i>p</i> = 0.321), quality of life (MD −0.91; 95% CI: −4.62 to 2.79; <i>p</i> = 0.626), global functioning (MD −2.25; 95% CI: −6.70 to 2.20; <i>p</i> = 0.318), or severe self-harm (RR 1.37; 95% CI: 0.70–2.84; <i>p</i> = 0.335). More participants in the long-term MBT group had a serious adverse event compared with short-term MBT (RR 1.63; 95% CI: 0.94–3.07; <i>p</i> = 0.088), primarily driven by a difference in psychiatric hospitalizations (RR 2.03; 95% CI: 0.99–5.09; <i>p</i> = 0.056). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Long-term MBT did not lead to lower levels of BPD symptoms, nor did it influence any of the secondary outcomes compared with short-term MBT.

Publisher

S. Karger AG

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Applied Psychology,Clinical Psychology,General Medicine

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3