Abstract
<b><i>Background and Objectives:</i></b> Ablative lesion procedures remain as the last option in treatment of refractory depression. Contemporary ablative psychosurgeries involve producing lesions in the anterior limb of the internal capsule (bilateral anterior capsulotomy – BAC), the supragenual anterior cingulate gyrus and cingulum (bilateral anterior cingulotomy – BACING), and subgenual anterior cingulate gyrus and subcortical orbitofrontal white matter (bilateral subcaudate tractotomy – BST). A combination of BACING and BST is known as limbic leukotomy (bilateral limbic leukotomy – BLL). All procedures claim some success, but cohorts are small, depression assessment instruments differ, and inclusion and outcome criteria and follow-up duration vary. In some cohorts, more than one type of surgery was performed in several patients, further confounding interpreting the available data. Current evidence is equivocal on which surgical target works best. <b><i>Method and Aim:</i></b> This systematic review and meta-analysis using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) standard on published cohorts was conducted to review and identify which is the best standalone ablative procedure for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) based on response rate (event rate) and adverse-effect profile using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. <b><i>Results and Conclusion:</i></b> As a standalone neurosurgical procedure, we found that BAC appears to be the most effective and safest of all the ablative targets for TRD. A major limitation of this conclusion is the paucity of published case series where sample sizes are small and all are open label.
Subject
Neurology (clinical),Surgery
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献