Fetal Anemia: Determinants and Perinatal Outcomes according to the Method of Intrauterine Blood Transfusion

Author:

Donepudi Roopali,Jouannic Jean-Marie,Maisonneuve Emeline,Sananes Nicolas,Muller Celine,Sánchez-Durán MA,Molina Francisca,Carretero Pilar,Antolin Eugenia,Duyos Inmaculada,Fabietti Isabella,Khalil Asma,Coutinho Conrado M.,Sangi-Haghpeykar Haleh,Sanz Cortes Magdalena

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Fetal anemia from hemolytic disease treated by intrauterine transfusion (IUT) can be performed by intraperitoneal, intracardiac, and intravascular transfusion (IVT). Objective of our study was to compare different transfusion techniques. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Retrospective review of IUT secondary to red cell alloimmunization was conducted at eight international centers from 2012 to 2020. Severe anemia suspected if middle cerebral artery peaks systolic velocity ≥1.5 multiples of the median. Demographic, delivery, and postnatal variables were analyzed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Total of 344 procedures, 325 IVT and 19 other techniques (non-IVT) included. No difference in demographics, history of stillbirth (20.5 vs. 15.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.7), prior pregnancy IUT (25.6 vs. 31.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.5) or neonatal transfusion (36.1 vs. 43.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.5). At first IUT, non-IVT had higher hydrops (42.1% vs. 20.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.03), lower starting hematocrit (13.3% [±6] vs. 17.7% [±8.2], <i>p</i> = 0.04), and trend toward lower gestational age (24.6 [20.1–27] vs. 26.4 [23.2–29.6] weeks, <i>p</i> = 0.08). No difference in birthweight, neonatal phototherapy, exchange, or simple transfusion was observed. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> This is one of the largest studies comparing techniques to treat fetal anemia. IVT was most performed, other techniques were more likely performed in hydrops, and lower starting hematocrit was seen. Neither technique affected outcomes. This study may suggest that physician’s experience may be the strongest contributor of outcomes.

Publisher

S. Karger AG

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Embryology,General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3