Comparison of Cytological Adequacy between 23- and 25-Gauge in Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules: A Single-Center Prospective Study

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Approximately 15% of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of thyroid nodules are considered nondiagnostic. Several factors are potentially involved, including clinical and nodule features but also the gauge (G) of the needle used. However, few studies have compared the cytological adequacy obtained with different gauge needles and the data are controversial. We aimed to evaluate cytological adequacy results using 23- or 25-G needles. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This study is an observational and prospective study of thyroid nodules submitted to ultrasound-guided FNA. The procedure was performed randomly using 23- or 25-G needles. The samples were reported by different cytopathologists who were blinded to the information of the gauge of the needle used. Statistical analysis was performed to compare cytological adequacy of FNA between the two groups. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 177 thyroid nodules were included – 98 (55.4%) using 23-G and 79 (44.6%) using 25-G needles. The 23-G group presented a higher rate of cytological adequacy (69.4% [68/98] vs. 46.8% [37/79], <i>p</i> = 0.002). No differences were found between the two groups regarding patient or nodule characteristics. On logistic regression, 23-G needles correlated with better cytological adequacy (unadjusted OR 2.57 [95% CI: 1.39–4.77]), even after adjusting for nodule dimension, location, and type of cytology (slides +/− additional liquid-based cytology) (adjusted OR 2.44 [95% CI: 1.23–4.84]). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The gauge of the needle used was found to be an independent predictor of cytological adequacy, with 23-G needles providing more adequate samples. Further investigation is needed to confirm our results in order to stablish the optimal diagnosis technique.