The Effectiveness of Metacognitive Therapy Compared to Behavioral Activation for Severely Depressed Outpatients: A Single-Center Randomized Trial

Author:

Schaich Anja,Outzen Janne,Assmann NeleORCID,Gebauer Carlotta,Jauch-Chara Kamila,Alvarez-Fischer Daniel,Hüppe Michael,Wells AdrianORCID,Schweiger UlrichORCID,Klein Jan PhilippORCID,Fassbinder EvaORCID

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly prevalent and disabling disorder. This study examines two psychotherapy methods for MDD, behavioral activation (BA), and metacognitive therapy (MCT), when applied as outpatient treatments to severely affected patients. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The study was conducted in a tertiary outpatient treatment center. Patients with a primary diagnosis of MDD (<i>N</i> = 122) were included in the intention-to-treat sample (55.7% female, mean age 41.9 years). Participants received one individual and one group session weekly for 6 months (M). Assessments took place at baseline, pretreatment, mid-treatment (3 M), post-treatment (6 M), and follow-up (12 M). The primary outcome was depressive symptomatology assessed by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression at 12 M follow-up. Secondary outcomes included general symptom severity, psychosocial functioning, and quality of life. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Linear mixed models indicated a change in depressive symptoms (<i>F</i>(2, 83.495) = 12.253, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) but no between-group effect (<i>F</i>(1, 97.352) = 0.183, <i>p</i> = 0.670). Within-group effect sizes were medium for MCT (post-treatment: <i>d</i> = 0.610; follow-up: <i>d</i> = 0.692) and small to medium for BA (post-treatment: <i>d</i> = 0.636, follow-up: <i>d</i> = 0.326). In secondary outcomes, there were improvements (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.040) with medium to large within-group effect sizes (<i>d</i> ≥ 0.501) but no between-group effects (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.304). Response and remission rates did not differ between conditions at follow-up (response MCT: 12.9%, BA: 13.3%, remission MCT: 9.7%, BA: 10.0%). The deterioration rate was lower in MCT than in BA (χ<sup>2</sup><sub>1</sub> = 5.466, <i>p</i> = 0.019, NTT = 7.4). <b><i>Discussion:</i></b> Both MCT and BA showed symptom reductions. Remission and response rates were lower than in previous studies, highlighting the need for further improvements in adapting/implementing treatments for severely affected patients with MDD.

Publisher

S. Karger AG

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Applied Psychology,Clinical Psychology,General Medicine

Reference42 articles.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3