Mepolizumab Effectiveness and Allergic Status in Real Life

Author:

Sposato Bruno,Scalese Marco,Camiciottoli Gianna,Carpagnano Giovanna Elisiana,Pelaia CorradoORCID,Santus Pierachille,Maniscalco Mauro,Corsico Angelo,Grosso Amelia,Baglioni Stefano,Murgia Nicola,Folletti Ilenia,Pelaia Girolamo,Masieri Simonetta,Cavaliere Carlo,Musarra Antonino,Bargagli Elena,Ricci Alberto,Latorre Manuela,Paggiaro Pierluigi,Rogliani Paola

Abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> It is not clear whether mepolizumab is differently effective in allergic and nonallergic severe eosinophilic asthmatics (SEA) in real life. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> We tested mepolizumab effectiveness in allergic/nonallergic SEA in real life. A strict criterion to identify the 2 phenotypes was used. <b><i>Method:</i></b> We retrospectively considered 134 consecutive patients divided into allergic, with a positivity to at least 1 allergen to prick tests and/or IgE values ≥100 UI/mL (severe allergic eosinophilic asthma [SAEA]; <i>n</i>: 97–72.4%), and nonallergic, with no prick test results and normal IgE levels &#x3c;100 UI/mL (severe nonallergic eosinophilic asthma [SNAEA]; <i>n</i>: 37–27.6%). They had taken mepolizumab for at least 6 months. <b><i>Results:</i></b> After 10.9 ± 3.7 months, improvements in FEV<sub>1</sub>%, FEF<sub>25–75</sub>%, exacerbation numbers, blood eosinophil (BE) counts, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) (ppb), percentages of patients that stopped/reduced short-acting β2-agonists (SABAs) or oral corticosteroid (OC), observed after treatment, were similar in both groups. Only Asthma Control Test (ACT) increases were higher in SNAEA (8 [5–9]) than in SAEA (5 [2.5–8.5]; <i>p</i> = 0.016). However, no differences were found after treatment in percentages of subjects with ACT ≥20, as well as with FEV<sub>1</sub> &#x3e;80%, FEF<sub>25–75</sub> &#x3e;65%, exacerbations ≤2, BE &#x3c;300 cells/µL, and FENO &#x3c;25 ppb between SAEA and SNAEA. Besides, no significant relationships were found, comparing SNAEA with SAEA, for FEV<sub>1</sub>% (β = −0.110; <i>p</i> = 0.266), FEF<sub>25–75</sub>% (β = −0.228; <i>p</i> = 0.06), BE counts (β = −0.012; <i>p</i> = 0.918), FENO (β = 0.234; <i>p</i> = 0.085), ACT (β = 0.046; <i>p</i> = 0.660), and exacerbations (β = −0.070; <i>p</i> = 0.437). No different associations between lung function and SNAEA occurrence when compared to SAEA condition (FEV<sub>1</sub> &#x3e;80%: OR = 1.04 [95% CI: 0.43–2.55], <i>p</i> = 0.923; FEF<sub>25–75</sub> &#x3e;65%: OR = 0.41 [95% CI: 0.08–2.03], <i>p</i> = 0.272) were detected. Neither all other parameters, such as ACT &#x3e;20 (OR = 0.73 [95% CI: 0.32–1.63], <i>p</i> = 0.440), presence of exacerbations (OR = 1.35 [95% CI: 0.55–3.27], <i>p</i> = 0.512), SABA discontinuation (OR = 1.16 [95% CI: 0.40–3.39], <i>p</i> = 0.790), and OC cessation/reduction (OR = 3.44 [95% CI: 0.40–29.27], <i>p</i> = 0.258), were differently associated with 1 or the other phenotype. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Mepolizumab can be considered as a valid therapeutic choice for either allergic or nonallergic SEA in real life.

Publisher

S. Karger AG

Subject

Immunology,General Medicine,Immunology and Allergy

Reference25 articles.

1. Tran TN, Zeiger RS, Peters SP, Colice G, Newbold P, Goldman M, et al. Overlap of atopic, eosinophilic, and TH2-high asthma phenotypes in a general population with current asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016;116(1):37–42.

2. Coumou H, Bel EH. Improving the diagnosis of eosinophilic asthma. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2016;10(10):1093–103.

3. Simon HU, Yousefi S, Germic N, Arnold IC, Haczku A, Karaulov AV, et al. The cellular functions of eosinophils: Collegium Internationale Allergologicum (CIA) update 2020. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2020;181(1):11–23.

4. Bel EH, Wenzel SE, Thompson PJ, Prazma CM, Keene ON, Yancey SW, et al. Oral glucocorticoid-sparing effect of mepolizumab in eosinophilic asthma. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(13):1189–97.

5. Bagnasco D, Caminati M, Menzella F, Milanese M, Rolla G, Lombardi C, et al. One year of mepolizumab. Efficacy and safety in real-life in Italy. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2019;58:101836.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3