Efficacy of Individualized Homeopathic Medicines in the Treatment of Cervical Spondylosis: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Author:

Tomar ManeelaORCID,Bhowmik Nitai Chand,Singh Subhas,Sadhukhan SatarupaORCID,Michael JamesORCID,Parewa ManeetORCID,Rai Shruti,Gupta Bharti,Vashisht Himani,Misra Pankhuri,Koley MunmunORCID,Saha SubhranilORCID

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Cervical spondylosis (CS) is a degenerative condition of the cervical spine, with approximately 80–90% of people suffering from disc degeneration by the age of 50 years. This trial attempts at evaluating the efficacy of individualized homeopathic medicines (IHMs) against placebos in the treatment of CS. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A 3-month, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at the Organon of Medicine outpatient department of the National Institute of Homoeopathy, India. Patients were randomized to receive either IHMs (<i>n</i> = 70) or identical-looking placebos (<i>n</i> = 70) in the mutual context of concomitant conservative and standard physiotherapeutic care. Primary outcome measures were 0–10 Numeric Rating Scales (NRSs) for pain, stiffness, numbness, tingling, weakness, and vertigo, and the secondary outcome was the Neck Disability Index (NDI), measured at baseline and every month until 3 months. The intention-to-treat sample was analyzed to detect group differences and effect sizes. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Overall, improvements were clinically significant and higher in the IHM group than the placebo group, but group differences were statistically nonsignificant with small effect sizes (all <i>p</i> &#x3e; 0.05, two-way repeated measure analysis of variance). After 2 months of time points, improvements observed in the IHM group were significantly higher than placebo on a few occasions (e.g., pain NRS: <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001; stiffness NRS: <i>p</i> = 0.024; weakness NRS: <i>p</i> = 0.003). <i>Sulfur</i> (<i>n</i> = 21; 15%) was the most frequently prescribed medication. No harm, unintended effects, or any serious adverse events were reported from either group. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> An encouraging but nonsignificant direction of effect was elicited favoring IHMs against placebos in the treatment of CS.

Publisher

S. Karger AG

Subject

Complementary and alternative medicine

Reference25 articles.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3