Comparison of Diagnostic Rates and Concordance with Subsequent Surgical Resections between Conventional Smear and ThinPrep Preparations versus ThinPrep Only in Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration (T-FNA) Specimens

Author:

Rufail Miguel,Jing Xin,Smola Brian,Heider Amer,Cantley Richard,Pang Judy C.,Lew Madelyn

Abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Thyroid fine needle aspiration (T-FNA) is a mainstay in management of thyroid nodules. However, the preparation of T-FNA specimens varies across institutions. Prior studies have compared diagnostic rates between different specimen preparations of T-FNA specimens and their associated advantages and disadvantages. However, few have compared the rates of all diagnostic categories of The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) between liquid-based preparations (LBPs) and a combination of LBP and conventional smear (CS) preparations. Our study compares TBSRTC diagnostic rates between these 2 cohorts and correlates cytologic diagnoses with subsequent thyroid resections to evaluate rates of neoplasia (RON) and malignancy (ROM). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> 584 consecutive thyroid FNA specimens were collected and stratified by preparation type (ThinPrep [TP] vs. CS &amp; TP). Diagnostic rates for each TBSRTC diagnostic category were calculated. The institution’s electronic medical records database was searched for histologic diagnoses of previously sampled thyroid nodules to evaluate the RON and ROM. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 584 thyroid FNA specimens, 73 (12.5%) and 511 (87.5%) were evaluated by TP only and CS &amp; TP, respectively, reflecting the predominance of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) with CS for T-FNAs at our institution. Of the TP only and CS &amp; TP cohorts, 29 (39.7%) and 98 (19.2%) had subsequent resections, respectively. The frequency of non-diagnostic cases was lower in the CS &amp; TP cohort (12.7% vs. 26%). While the diagnostic rate of follicular lesion of undetermined significance was similar for both cohorts, SFN categorization was only utilized in the CS &amp; TP cohort (1.5% vs. 0%). Although RON and ROM were similar between cohorts in many of the TBSRTC categories, there was a higher RON associated with non-diagnostic specimens in the TP only cohort when the denominator included all non-diagnostic cases. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The combination of CS and LBP may potentially decrease the non-diagnostic rate of T-FNA specimens as well as the number of passes required for diagnosis, particularly with ROSE. Evaluation of morphologic features highlighted in conventional smears may facilitate diagnostic categorization in the “suspicious for follicular neoplasm” category.

Publisher

S. Karger AG

Subject

General Medicine,Histology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference15 articles.

1. Saleh H, Bassily N, Hammoud MJ. Utility of a liquid-based, monolayer preparation in the evaluation of thyroid lesions by fine needle aspiration biopsy: comparison with the conventional smear method. Acta Cytol. 2009;53(2):130–6.

2. Saleh HA, Hammoud J, Zakaria R, Khan AZ. Comparison of thin-prep and cell block preparation for the evaluation of thyroid epithelial lesions on fine needle aspiration biopsy. Cytojournal. 2008;5:3.

3. Chong Y, Ji SJ, Kang CS, Lee EJ. Can liquid-based preparation substitute for conventional smear in thyroid fine-needle aspiration? A systematic review based on meta-analysis. Endocr Connect. 2017;6(8):817–29.

4. Duncan LD, Forrest L, Law WM, Hubbard E, Stewart LE. Evaluation of thyroid fine-needle aspirations: can ThinPrep be used exclusively to appropriately triage patients having a thyroid nodule? Diagn Cytopathol. 2011;39(5):341–8.

5. Chang H Lee E, Lee H, Choi J, Kim A, Kim BH. Comparison of diagnostic values of thyroid aspiration samples using liquid-based preparation and conventional smear: one-year experience in a single institution. APMIS. 2013;121(2):139–45.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3